Talk:Spodoptera littoralis

Review for Behavioral Ecology Course

Untitled

Hello all,

This is an outstanding article that I believe should be considered for the "good article" status in the near future. One aspect of the moth that I thought could be explored is diapause. I believe that this moth does partake in diapause and that can be added to the article. Additionally, in the mating section, there could be a "male/male interaction" section added to describe how males interact or compete with other males to attract females. The habitat section also seemed a little short. I think this can be combined with the distribution section along with a distribution map with the locations where Spodoptera littoralis is found highlighted. I removed an external link that had no wikipedia page and was therefore highlighted in red. I also added a subtitle (copulation characteristics) to head the first paragraph under the "Mating" section. Overall, great article! vkrishnan2 (talk) 13:28, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Another review: First of all, this is really great work so far—very detailed and informative. I’ve read through your article and made some small grammar changes (i.e. adding commas). I’ve also added more to your “Similar species” section as well as add a whole new section on “Flight.” For future edits, I want to recommend finding more information on oviposition or physiology such as vision since the species is nocturnal (for example, night vision when it forages at night). I think these information will be interesting and fit in well with what you already have. Y.shin (talk) 21:17, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sungjaepark. Peer reviewers: Y.shin.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Review

Hello-

I made some grammatical edits and rewrote some of your sentences to make the article flow better. Overall, I believe that this article is a comprehensive general overview of your moth. However, It is lacking some detail in sections such as the Habitat, Distribution, and Food Resources. I would advise adding more information to these sections in order to make this a good article. Also, your lead section should be 3 more paragraphs as well.Sahilmehta97 (talk) 16:45, 29 October 2017 (UTC)