Talk:St. John's lacrosse case
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Arms & Hearts in topic Move?
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Comments
edit- Comment: May not meet the mos. 333-blue 07:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- @333-blue: of course, meeting the WP:MOS is not one of the criteria for creation at AfC, is it? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Needs to be edited for grammar and tone. I'm not sure whether that needs to be done before approving the article, or if it is better done once it is in mainspace and we can get more people involved. Bradv 16:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Bradv: I think you were on the right lines when you were thinking that it could be improved once in mainspace. Perfect grammar or tone is not a criterion for AfC. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:28, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Move?
editShould this article be moved to something like St. John's rape case (which redirect I've just created)? It seems to me that lacrosse is not really the central issue. The current title may be necessary per WP:COMMONNAME however. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 22:43, 16 August 2019 (UTC)