Talk:Stagecoach Group

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2013; 2017; 2020;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Learn more about this page

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: in UK / UK Trams / in Scotland Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Trams (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Transport in Scotland (assessed as Mid-importance).

Buses Low‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Scotland Mid‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Infobox reverts

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

this is a stupid thing to edit war over. Stop it, everybody. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 20:20, 16 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Having a consistent style for UK articles does not seem stupid to me. It is a longstanding consensus which should be respected.Charles (talk) 20:53, 16 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

The article had UK at the end for over 2 years. Until this edit

24 March 2019‎ .

I simply changed it back. Then Charles has been reverting back to this edit and also removed additional edits that I made to the article and has been inconsistent with the reason for reverting:

UK is not needed or wanted per consensus.Not an improvement. - pointed out there is no consensus
See Wikiproject UKGeography - no rule on Wikiproject UKGeography

This user has now been following my edits reverting them, including removal of factual information such the article on Virgin Rail Group where Charles has removed the operating subsidiary and replaced it with former subsidiaries, but using the reason of UK not needed per general consensus . [1]

If you look at my previous history of edits, creation of articles and reporting of vandals, I have only made edits which are factual. If I am being warned, then Charles should also be warned too.

I look forward to your reply. Angryskies (talk) 21:26, 16 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

You've missed the point I was making, which was about behaviour, not content. The "stupid" here refers to the pair of you continually reverting each other, without coming here to discuss things. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 22:27, 16 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

If we're looking for a consensus on the edit - then I support Charlesdrakew's version Jeni ^(talk) 23:48, 16 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

Archives (Index)
2013 2017 2020
This page is archived by ClueBot III.