Talk:Stars at Noon (2022 film)
Latest comment: 4 hours ago by Nyxaros in topic Lead consensus
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stars at Noon (2022 film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Lead consensus
editHi @Nyxaros! I believe I understand your reasoning. But it leads me to believe that virtually all consensus blurbs across Wikipedia would then be guilty of WP:SYNTH. For example, how would you assess the consensus at Don't Look Up or more obviously at Fall (2022 film). More often, I find consensus statements on album articles. For example, Future Nostalgia or Hit Me Hard and Soft. Or even The Tortured Poets Department. All these articles would appear to contain synthesis because they are not citing a journalistic source that repeats the substance of critics' reviews. Would I be correct in amending them accordingly? Οἶδα (talk) 06:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, I've not checked the album articles you mentioned and barely glanced at Don't Look Up, which includes statements such as "critics were displeased by the light tone" and multiple reviews describing it as a smug satire so it can be properly summarized without a synthesis. But as you mentioned, the text of Fall (2022 film) was completely unsourced, which is why I removed it. If you find more examples, you can remove or change the info accordingly. ภץאคгöร 11:46, 6 July 2024 (UTC)