Talk:Stay Hungry Stay Foolish

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 September 2023. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Gujarat Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Gujarat (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'd rather swap the content sections and size. "Stay Hungry Stay Foolish" is first and foremost the closing message of The Whole Earth Catalog. Then, secondly, a reference as made by a famous tycoon of the 2000s, then, thirdly, a book. Seems that it's the wrong way around now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.111.143.154 (talk • contribs) 14:00, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reiteration of previous proposal

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I agree with the previous proposal. This MBA book is of secondary importance and fame relatively to Steve Jobs' quote. It's thanks to Steve Jobs that this quote has become renown, and he embodies its meaning.Thus, the first and second sections should be swapped. Also, a short explanation should be provided. This Quora-Q&A give good insights about the meaning of the two parts composing the sentence. I think this should be done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.218.252.158 (talk) 20:23, 13 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic