Talk:Stephanie McMahon

Latest comment: 23 days ago by Stims2 in topic Board memberships are not accurate
Former good articleStephanie McMahon was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 2, 2009Good article nomineeListed
February 8, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article


Semi-protected edit request on 24 November 2021

edit

Change height from 1.73m to 1.75m. A simple Google search reveals the same. Source:Google Mammoos 007 (talk) 13:00, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
fandom and google reveal this quite prominently. pls check for yourself. Mammoos 007 (talk) 13:27, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Google search results and fandom are not reliable sources. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Attitude Era

edit

Request to include at least one mention/link to Attitude Era in article, as Stephanie McMahon debuted during AE. 130.45.24.168 (talk) 00:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

This 2009 listing contains significant uncited material, meaning it does not meet GA criterion 2b), and is heavily weighted towards her wrestling career, meaning it does not meet criterion 4. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Edit Request

edit


  • I think you should change the Halloween kiss with bischoff episode on Smackdown in 2002(format using {{textdiff}}):
  • I feel it should be changed because it is unimportant information based on her life:
  • References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

69.74.81.70 (talk) 19:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. PianoDan (talk) 18:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply


  • I think the part that mentions the kiss on Halloween with Eric Bischoff should be changed. (format using {{textdiff}}):
  • I think it should be changed because it is not relevant to her story as a general manager on Smackdown and is not necessary. It is also creepy and makes me uncomfortable.:
  • References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

69.115.23.219 (talk) 22:15, 8 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

As a woman that part makes me uncomfortable. I feel that part should be removed. 69.115.23.219 (talk) 22:17, 8 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Bowler the Carmine | talk 05:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply


  • I think the kiss between McMahon and bischoff should be removed. (format using {{textdiff}}):
  • I think it should be changed because it was not consensual as he forcefully did it and she tried to escape. This is considered sexual assault and not a shared kiss between the two. It was also done out of malice and overstepped boundaries in competition. In addition to this, fandom and other sources took this part out.:
  • https://bwwe.fandom.com/wiki/Stephanie_McMahon (format using the "cite" button):

69.115.23.219 (talk) 17:22, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: Aside from WP:NOTCENSORED being a thing, you're talking about a fictional storyline. — Czello (music) 07:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I understand. You said they shared a kiss. Which is false because it was forced. At least change it to forced also if you are going to talk about that at least share the details so that you aren't censoring the details of the storyline. In addition to this, if you are going to talk about that talk about other storylines where the kisses she gives with other superstars are consensual. Otherwise, it looks like you are censoring information that is important. 69.74.81.70 (talk) 16:52, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
In addition to that, that is why I would like that part changed. 69.74.81.70 (talk) 16:54, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Board memberships are not accurate

edit

On the page, Stephanie McMahon is identified as presently serving on multiple Boards. This appears not to be accurate.


She is not listed as a Board member for the Ad Council. https://www.adcouncil.org/our-advisors/board-of-directors


She is not listed as a Board member for the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Foundation: https://www.givetochildrens.org/about-us/


There is a question whether she is associated with the USO Metropolitan Washington. Related, it appears that this entity is now USO Mid-Atlantic.

One website page identifies her as being on the Board: https://midatlantic.uso.org/stories/preview/5378e5f3-f107-4a70-b50f-9e884f47f70b


Another website page identifies the WWE's Advisor position as being vacant: https://midatlantic.uso.org/about/uso-mid-atlantic-council Stims2 (talk) 20:45, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply