Talk:Stephen Sondheim Theatre/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Epicgenius in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 14:25, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply


I'll be taking a look at this! — GhostRiver 14:25, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Infobox and lede

edit

Design

edit

Facade

edit

Interior

edit

History

edit

Original theater

edit
  • Close paraphrasing with and returned to performance use as the Kit Kat Club
  • "because Miller sometimes worked with" → "because Miller had a history of working with"

Current theater

edit
  • "to make way" → "to make room", as "to make way" was used in the sentence above
  • In 2007, Roundabout announced it would operate the theater as its third Broadway venue. I don't love this phrasing and can't put my finger on why. I think it feels like the sentence should end after "theater", and so the last bit seems tacked on, although I know that it's important
    • I rephrased it to "Roundabout announced in 2007 that it would operate the theater, which would become its third Broadway venue". I think the issue stems from the fact that "as its third Broadway venue" should be a modifier for "Roundabout's operation of the theater", rather than the word "theater". Epicgenius (talk) 16:27, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "with a production of a revival of" → "with a revival production of"
  • "and ran for three months" → "which ran for three months" (because you're referring to Bye Bye Birdie, not the theater)
  • No commas needed around "prior to its renaming"

Notable productions

edit
  • Good

References

edit
  • Good as always

General comments

edit
  • All images are relevant and properly licensed
  • No stability issues in the revision history
  • Earwig score looks generally good at 15.3%, some close paraphrasing noted above
  • My most general comment is to make sure that the use of "theater" vs. "theatre" is consistent
    • I had used "theater" for both the theater house and the theatre operation in general, so it might be confusing. I've rephrased some of these instances. The thing that gives me pause is that in good ol' American, we should use "theater", but our article on Broadway theatre uses the British spelling. And the common name of the theater (or should it be theatre?) is the British spelling. For the time being I've changed it to "theatre", though my keyboard really wants me to change it back to "theater". Epicgenius (talk) 18:47, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the comments GhostRiver. I have addressed all the issues you brought up so far, but let me know if you have more. Epicgenius (talk) 18:47, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Epicgenius Thank you for making those changes so far! I had to leave before totally finishing this review, so there are just a couple more comments to address in the lede and in the "original theatre" section. — GhostRiver 15:35, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
GhostRiver Thanks. I have done this now. Epicgenius (talk) 16:27, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply