Talk:Stun belt
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stun belt article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
edit50 kV does not seem correct. It is impossible to generate and it would kill instantly the man and everything in a close distance. It must be probably lower than 50 V. Can someone check the information? 85.73.9.129
50kV low-amperage. It's trivial to generate with a flyback coil, and will only kill if the amperage is high, which it won't be in such a device. It is also too low to be incapacitating, according to the stun gun article. Consider that static electricity frequently exceeds 10kV, yet the net charge is low. Zuiram 04:04, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
potential info: http://www.progressive.org/mag_cusactech
Have added a "needs updating" tag since none of the references or information on this page is post 2000.Shankargopal (talk) 10:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Are stun belts not "notable?"
edit@Widefox: Is this article's subject not notable enough to have its own Wikipedia article? Jarble (talk) 17:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Looking at the current sourcing, I don't know, is it? Widefox; talk 21:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Widefox: Other than the sources cited here, the use of electroshock weapons against prisoners in the United States has received plenty of news coverage. Are the sources cited in this article still not adequate? Jarble (talk) 19:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- WP:SIGCOV is needed, any good refs there about the topic, rather than mentions? regards. Widefox; talk 19:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Widefox: Other than the sources cited here, the use of electroshock weapons against prisoners in the United States has received plenty of news coverage. Are the sources cited in this article still not adequate? Jarble (talk) 19:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Looking at the current sourcing, I don't know, is it? Widefox; talk 21:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)