The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that despite many critics writing that "Stupid in Love" was about Rihanna and Chris Brown's altercation on the night of the 51st Grammy Awards, the song was written two days before the event?
This article was nominated for deletion on 22 November 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rihanna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rihanna on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RihannaWikipedia:WikiProject RihannaTemplate:WikiProject RihannaRihanna articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
"The song was described by Ne-Yo as being a "premonition,"[1] due to how it contains lyrics which are closely linked to an abusive relationship." --> "The lyrical content, which describes an abusive relationship, led Ne-Yo to describe the song as a "premonition".[1]
"Stupid in Love" is a pop and R&B power ballad. Instrumentation is provided by finger snapping, minor piano keys and piano riffs." I think these sentences should be combined as "Stupid in Love" is a pop and R&B power ballad featuring instrumentation provided by finger snapping, minor piano keys and piano riffs."
Not done The instrumentation isn't a feature, which is what it sounds like with your suggestion. Aaron • You Da One
I am not sure what you mean, I meant featured as in it is contained in the song. It will not affect the GA review though. Basilisk4u (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
"whereas other criticized it as being too dark and forgettable" --> "whereas others criticized it as being forgettable and overly dark"
"As noted by Rob Harvilla of The Village Voice, the bridge represents the moment when Rihanna realizes that it is not worth her while to stay in the relationship, writing "the dunce cap is off". Is that Harvilla himself writing that Rihanna's dunce cap is off, or is it a lyric from the song?
"Norman Mayers for Nu-Soul Magazine concurred with McCormick, writing that Rihanna does shy away from what happened between herself and Brown, rather, she confronts it directly on "Stupid in Love"." It should be "does not shy away"
I think you could begin the second paragraph of this section with a summary sentence, perhaps something along the lines of "The musical aspect of "Stupid in Love" was less well-received than the song's lyrical content."
Both paragraphs don't need opening summaries. The second is simply a continuation of the first. Aaron • You Da One
I have finished the review, sorry it took so long :( I am now putting the review on hold in order for a few tiny adjustments to be made. Good work! Basilisk4u (talk) 23:16, 23 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Done Aaron • You Da One
Not done The instrumentation isn't a feature, which is what it sounds like with your suggestion. Aaron • You Da One
