Talk:Subaltern Studies

Guha death

Is he deceased or not? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.131.56.31 (talk) 00:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC).

Critique

It seems that subaltern studies has come under fire lately... would it be worth summarizing some of the critiques?

Bios for Arnold & Hardiman

As founding members, it seems that their scholarship is at least as important as other historians with individual bio pages... 24.125.38.175 (talk) 16:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC) R.E.D. p.s. the SSG article is awfully shabby. Needs attention of an expert. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.125.38.175 (talk) 16:48, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Criteria?

I propose that only people who have edited and/or contributed to any of the SS volumes be listed as scholars associated with the group. The addition of Touraj Atabaki is absurd! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.180.28.179 (talk) 19:03, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Has Vijay Prashad contributed to any of the Subaltern Studies volumes? -Mohanbhan (talk) 11:18, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Subaltern Studies or Subaltern Studies Group

I think there is problem with the title being Subaltern Studies and then the opening being about the Subaltern Studies Group. I think it might be best to relegate the group to a section. Any thoughts or should I just give it a go? (Msrasnw (talk) 21:39, 13 August 2011 (UTC))

Good point. I read the article with some confusion about whether there is an academic journal called Subaltern Studies (as suggested by the link I followed) or whether this is a scholars' group, or a group plus a movement. How about some historical narrative? — ℜob C. alias ÀLAROB 17:15, 31 October 2011 (UTC)