Talk:Suillus spraguei

Pre-FAC evaluation

• Images are missing alt-text

• It's no longer an FAC requirment. Sasata (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

• I don't like name casually mentioned without their current status specified. It would appear that Schultze name is nowadays treated under Coltricia perennis

• Added a note about this. Took me a while to remember how to do the code for citation in a footnote! Sasata (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

• Why is "flesh" linked twice?

• Fixed. Sasata (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

• I'm fairly sure "oblong" cango without a link, and it would probably be simpler to use a synonym for "inaequilateral" (which to me implies quadrilateral spores...)

• Done. Sasata (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

• • Alternatively, a morphological section in spore that could be linked to the way leaf shape can might be useful.

• Yes, that would work too; making spore/ascospore/basidiospore respectable is a future project. Sasata (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

• Consider moving the various bruising-color statements so they are together. Running across them repetitively is annoying.

• Done. Sasata (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

• How would one actually tell spraguei and decipiens apart?

• Added details, and a pic too. Sasata (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

• The association is poorly characterized, by definition, if the species sometimes associate with members of Pinus subg. Pinus, then saying it "forms ectomycorrhizal relationships with five-needled pine species" (i.e. subg. Strobus) is inaccurate.

• Yeah, I picked up the five-needled pine factoid from somewhere I can't remember, as it was not in the source I had cited. Took it out. Sasata (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

• Put it back in... it is actually five-needle pine, the other Pinus associations are in vitro, but not known to occur naturally. Sasata (talk) 07:56, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

• When DO North American boletes typically appear?

• Added a generalization (note no page number given in the source, it's an observation from me scanning several dozen species descriptions throughout the whole book... am I running afoul of WP:Synthesis?) Sasata (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Circéus (talk) 01:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Circeus! I'll work on these later tonight. Sasata (talk) 01:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Clear vandalism in first paragraph - re twitch streamers death. I have deleted it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.31.202.190 (talk) 09:56, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Suillus spraguei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718024927/http://tai2.ntu.edu.tw/taiwania/pdf/tai.1980.25.1.166.pdf to http://tai2.ntu.edu.tw/taiwania/pdf/tai.1980.25.1.166.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 6 October 2017 (UTC)