Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Suillus spraguei/archive1
Support. Great as usual, I've no doubt you'll deal with my small concerns Dealt with. Researching that taxonomic history and rendering it comprehensible is an impressive feat by itself. J Milburn (talk) 22:23, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Sources comment: All sources look OK, verification spotchecks carried out. Brianboulton (talk) 23:37, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support and comments No real concerns, some nitpicks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:21, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
The ring is white in the lead and grey in the description.tested with chemical tests — repeat of tested/testsammonium hydroxide — personally I'd prefer ammonia solution, because that's more accurate, but not a big dealmore brownish — "browner"?
- Thanks Jim, I changed all but the last; I think there's a subtle distinction between browner and more brownish (my wife assures me it's true!) and didn't want to deviate from the intent of the source. Sasata (talk) 17:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- Fine, I'm assured that wives are WP:RS — by my wife! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Dab/EL check - no dabs or dead external links. --PresN 22:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support made a couple of minor tweaks prosewise and nothing prosewise or comprehensivenesswise is left to obstruct a thumbs up from me. Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:24, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.