Talk:Sumant Sinha

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: official sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:57, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

COI

This article has been heavily edited by a user whose sole contributions in the three months his or her account has existed are to this article and the company headed by this individual. Close connection to the subject is suggested by the user's uploading a photograph of the subject under claim of "own work." Accordingly, the article could use review to ensure neutrality, particularly as the contributor has a history of removing sourced content without explanation in spite of multiple warnings. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:54, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Volunteering to review the contents

Looks like there are certain issues with the article regarding COI and the content policy. I shall be taking up this article to clean up according to Wikipedia content policy. I shall be slightly slow in doing it, still must be able to do justice. --Ch.th (talk) 20:13, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

I have completed the editing of this page. In case anybody wants to update grammar or beautification, please feel free.--Ch.th (talk) 10:32, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

COI2

Not confident with overall removal of puffery WP:PUFF. Re-applying the following tags - Advert, Cleanup-PR, and COI via WP:TWINKLE. -Hatchens (talk) 16:59, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Dear Prolix, Can I have your opinion on this article? Earlier, I tried to remove as much as puffery. But, I still have my own doubts. - Hatchens (talk) 05:44, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

TheAafi, you can also join in here to assess this page. Let me introduce you to Prolix. Prolix is an unbiased/neutral editor with a specialization in South Asian pages. And, Prolix ... please meet TheAafi, a seasoned Wikipedia editor (also a fellow AfC review/New page reviewer) from India whose astute observation and reasoning is quite remarkable. - Hatchens (talk) 08:58, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Hatchens, I also feel that this article needs more copyediting but my bad, I'm really very bad in this.Who do you think has the COI here? ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 10:25, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

TheAafi, copyediting is a must. COI; a couple of editors... can't zero down per se (until and unless we deploy EIA tool). Can you just help in whether this entity passes WP:GNG as per WP:RS? Because I'm still getting accustomed to South Asian RS links. - Hatchens (talk) 12:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Hatchens, I guess no. Seen few reliable sources like this, this but they're all unhelpful. The sources altogether are about someone else from his family like this and Sumant has been mentioned there as "so and so". ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 12:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Hatchens, article needs some mild copyediting but otherwise doesn't read much like an advert or press release. Subject is certainly notable, I was able to find multiple articles relating to the topic: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

I haven't checked the current citations on the page but the ones I linked certainly prove that the article passes WP:GNG. Hope this helps. Prolix 💬 13:26, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Prolix, thank you very much. Your insight and TheAafi's insight... both are important for me. I'm just going to build a wiki table out here... to analyze this page. This activity I am doing for my own learning purpose w.r.t. South Asian pages. Please bear with me on this and guide me if I'm making any mistakes in my analysis. - Hatchens (talk) 13:30, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Page Sources Analysis

Source Sites	Links	Written by Staff Writer	Reliability as per WP:RS	Significant Coverage as per WP:SIGCOV
Forbes India	LINK	YES	YES WP:FORBES	YES
The Economic Times	LINK	YES	YES Part of WP:TOI	YES
The Economic Times	LINK	YES	YES Part of WP:TOI	YES
The Times of India	LINK	YES (BUT NO NAME MENTIONED)	YES Part of WP:TOI	YES
Bloomberg News	LINK	YES	YES 1	PASSABLE MENTION
BloombergQuint	LINK	YES	YES 1	YES
Quartz	LINK	YES	YES 1	YES
The Hindu Business Line	LINK	YES	YES 1	YES
The Hindu	LINK	YES	YES 1	YES

I guess entity clearly passes WP:GNG, only a copyediting is required. TheAafi, Prolix... what you guys think? -Hatchens (talk) 13:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Hatchens, wholeheartedly agree. Shouldn't be too much work to get the article in shape. Some of these citations could be used in the article to expand it in the process. Prolix 💬 13:58, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Hatchens, Prolix, I've trimmed few things from the article and removed some unhelpful sources; I too agree with above sources being significant. Best. ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 14:06, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

TheAafi, and Prolix - Thank you once again for your kind support. I accept my fault for misjudging this entity. For me, this page was always an "on the fence" kinda scenario as I did a bit of copyediting work (on this page) in September 2020 but still some doubt arose due to my recent experience as an AfC reviewer. Thank you once again. I'm removing the maintenance tags. - Hatchens (talk) 14:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Hatchens, that is what discussion is about right? I've made countless mistakes and errors here too but they're all an opportunity to learn! Good day Prolix 💬 17:50, 9 January 2021 (UTC)