Talk:Sun Corporation

Sun Electronics

Should the whole history and redirect of Sun Electronics/Sun Denshi go to it's own article? Sunsoft is indeed important, and needs some history behind it, but it seems that any documentation or an article on the parent company is completely lacking in any shape or form whatsoever. Should we add an article about the parent company, as there is one about it's subsidary? --FME-7 (talk) 04:08, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Page Moved

Moved it to the correct name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cube b3 (talk • contribs) 03:08, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

The copy-and-paste move to SUNSOFT has been undone. —C.Fred (talk) 03:24, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Name Correction

Sunsoft is the incorrect name. The correct name is SUNSOFT as shown in the official site. Formally requesting a page move using the Wikipedia Move Template [[1]] 2017-04-26 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billfromhk (talk • contribs) 09:53, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Like Sega, SUNSOFT should be in capital's it is there policy.--Cube b3 (talk) 03:07, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia practice is to not render all-capital names as such in articles. Compare with your example: Sega. Please see WP:ALLCAPS for further information. —C.Fred (talk) 03:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Reference suggestions

• An in-depth interview with a former employee
• The Spirit of Sunsoft

Requested move 26 April 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved per WP:SNOW. This RM is clearly not going to pass. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

---

Sunsoft → SUNSOFT – Sunsoft is the incorrect name. The correct name is SUNSOFT as shown in the official site Billfromhk (talk) 10:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

• Oppose per MOS:TMRULES. This doesn't appear to be an acronym and it's written this way in reliable sources. Nohomersryan (talk) 17:38, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose per MOS:TMRULES, verbatim - not an acronym and written this way in reliable sources. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose per WP:UCRN, "Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title" Consider adding something similar to "NETGEAR Inc. (stylized, trademarked, and marketed as NETGEAR)" as in NETGEAR's lede, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netgear. Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 20:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment Per all guidelines, this looks like it should read "Netgear Inc. (stylized, trademarked, and marketed as NETGEAR)". A more compliant (and extreme) example is the Product Red article:

"Product Red, stylized as (PRODUCT)^RED ..."

--NapoliRoma (talk) 22:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

I agree and decided to make the change myself since the current version of the Netgear aricle was not consistent with standard practice. Neither this aricle, Nvidia, or the Sega article open with the styalized spelling.--64.229.167.158 (talk) 23:58, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

• Oppose move per all above.  ONR  (talk)  22:36, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - Sunsoft is the official name; SUNSOFT is just how it appears in their stylized font.--Martin IIIa (talk) 13:29, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.