This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Sunlight (Spacey Jane album) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
@Marcostev8, I'm pausing here to give you a chance to respond to the source review (2b) before we wrap up on prose/comprehensiveness, since those might get tweaked during the source review. Let me know your responses - the article's in pretty good shape overall! —Ganesha811 (talk) 05:53, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hey @Ganesha811, thanks for the feedback! As for my responses to 2b:
I believe Pilerats to be a reliable source. It is a well-established online music publication founded in 2011 with a sizeable team that writes about new local releases, interviews and reviews. They also produce professional live music content. They have been an invaluable resource reading about emerging bands from Western Australia, particularly their early interviews with Spacey Jane. In many cases they provide the only solid information online about some indie musicians, by talking directly to the artists themselves.
Cool, seems fine.
Tone Deaf is a reliable source - they constantly post Aussie music news and original interviews with well-known bands with the Chats, San Cisco and the Buoys all having write-ups from the past week or so. A lot of their journalists also write for Rolling Stone Australia as both are under the parent company, The Brag.
Ditto.
I'm removing Indie Is Not a Genre from the Critical Reception section as I can't prove its reliability. However, am I able to keep that reference in discussion of the musical qualities of the album (2nd para of Composition)? I think the author Ben Malkin still provides an objective and valuable insight into Spacey Jane's production and influences, even if it's not a well established website.
I think it'd be ok to keep it for that purpose, yes.
I've replaced the deadlinked reference from the Northern Beaches Review with the same article published by Tasmania's The Examiner (same article, published under multiple mastheads).
I've removed mention of "Booster Seat" being the sixth single for now, as I can't find a source that says what date it was made a single.
Hey @Ganesha811, I believe I've taken on board all feedback. In terms of the personnel credits, they are sourced from the liner notes (standard according to WP:PERSONNEL) – does this still need a citation? If not, all should be good. Thanks! Marcostev8 (talk) 10:16, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
There's a few WP:DUPLINKS - generally once in the lead and once in the body is enough, with reasonable exceptions. I recommend installing User:Evad37/duplinks-alt, which will highlight them and making removing them easier.
As is my usual practice, I've gone through and made prose tweaks myself to save us both time. If there are any you object to, just let me know and we can discuss.
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
Where are the personnel and their instrument/track credits sourced from?
Issue discussed, pass.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
What's the case for Pilerats being a reliable source?
Tone Deaf appears ok on spec (they have an editorial policy and are part of a larger organization), but please confirm that they should be regarded as a reliable source.
Indie Is Not A Genre appears to be a blog - can you make a case for them being a reliable source?
#27 (Leeson) appears to be a deadlink, although the archive link pretty much works. Please replace with a live link or tag as a dead link.
Also, what's the case for Northern Beaches Review as a reliable source?
#28 (Spotify) doesn't have information about being sent to commercial radio, just a plain release date with no context. Better source needed.
Generally well-cited to reliable sources! Just a few issues noted above.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
.svg){kind=logo}
