Talk:Sursand
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://books.google.co.in/books?id=LRMmAQAAIAAJ&dq=sursand+nepal&source=gbs_navlinks_s. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 17:40, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
- The text and the Google books link were added in this edit. Note the spelling mistakes "and oame to settle", "would he a Raja", "He shgwed his moderation" - the text has been OCR'd from the book. This book reference would be useful in re-creating a non-violating history section, but Google Books isn't showing me enough of the text to make this possible. -- John of Reading (talk) 17:40, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Correction
editWhen I realised that the book was published in 1907 I asked at WP:MCQ. This is not a copyright violation. I have restored most of the deleted text. -- John of Reading (talk) 18:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC)