Talk:Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (2007 film)

Black Comedy?

Sometimes film critics and reviewers do make a bit strange choices concerning the definition of a movie genre, but I can't imagine a world where this movie could be called a comedy, either black or any other sort. There's not a single comical moment in Burton's Sweeney Todd. A black comedy is basically a genre of cruel jokes, comical situations with grim background. It's surreal, all right, but there are no jokes in this movie. It's a pure musical thriller or even slasher. I suggest removing the words "black comedy" from the article. 94.77.130.12 (talk) 19:18, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

No comedy? How about the songs "Pirelli's Miracle Elixir" and "A Little Priest"... there are certainly jokes in those songs. Even the subdued, shortened version of "A Little Priest" that's used in the movie is hilarious; it's full of jokes. 71.38.117.4 (talk) 02:25, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

To-do list per Peer Review

Going through the various reviews etc there are a few outstanding issues we still have to address, so I've listed them below. EyeSerene^talk 09:33, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

• Further plot reduction, if possible?

• Check for overlinking (we only need links that are relevant to context, and then only on the first instance). There's some work to do here :P

• Get hold of "Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (ISBN 1845767047)" and check for any extra info we can include from the book.

• Add a sound clip of Depp + HBC

• Check citations for consistent formatting

• Check sources for reliability, specifically:
  • http://www.iesb.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3786&Itemid=99
  • http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/news/topnews.php?id=4044
  • http://www.emanuellevy.com/article.php?articleID=8130
  • http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/entertainment/Sweeney+Todd-47735.html
  • http://www.highdefdigest.com/

Wikiquote DOES NOT have a collection of quotations related to: Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (film) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.200.141.242 (talk) 08:54, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Citation for the "1846" setting?

I've been cleaning up a lot of the character info boxes for characters in Sweeney Todd (not just specific to the film version) because someone had gone through and added specific birth dates that did not match the story. I just noticed that the plot description in this article said it was set in 1846, which does not make any sense. The original story (which was written in 1846, perhaps this is the cause of confusion) was set in 1785. The musical stage adaptations have had a variety of settings, including modern times, but traditionally the story has always been said to occur in the late 18th century, and Burton's film appears to match this as well. The clothing styles are somewhat jumbled, but most of it seems to be late 18th century with a few anachronistic exceptions. The film has a child being executed for petty theft, which was ended in 1808, and execution of children in general was very rare by the mid 19th century. I've removed the 1846 date, but if there is a cite that the film version is supposed to be set in a specific year it should be provided.

12.40.5.69 (talk) 00:08, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Sondheim's Mistake...Should it be mentioned?

In the movie, death occurred within seconds of Sweeney's victim's throats beging slit. However, even in cutting both the cartoid and jugulars, unconsciousness occurs within ten to forty seconds, and death happens almost a minute later. This varies on a variety of factors, such as heart rate, depth of the cut, and how quickly the cut bleeds out. You must remember, the human body contains approxamately 5 quarts of blood. Should this be mentioned in the article?Latte freak (talk) 22:30, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

No. It should be mentioned only if it was a concern of a critic or someone involved with the film and it is sourced. Films have plot "holes" but as they are works of fiction, they don't necessarily need to work under the laws of nature. BOVINEBOY2008 :) 22:36, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

I know this is years after the original posting but for reference anyway: I do believe it was the smashing of the skull on the floor, after falling through the trapdoor, that kills the victims - thus how the judge doesn't die straight away because there are several bodies already there that haven't been ground up yet; indeed, in one version of Sweeney Todd (though I can't honesty say I recall which one) their throats aren't even slit; they're just dropped down the trapdoor. Lordloss210 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.175.97.87 (talk) 10:28, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. Ucucha 05:18, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

---

Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (film) → Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (2007 film) — The title is shared with at least one other film, Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (1936 film), thus it should be disambiguated per WP:NCF. BOVINEBOY2008 :) 02:50, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

• Support The proposer is indeed correct.--Labattblueboy (talk) 07:31, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
• Support per the naming conventions. Already disambiguated, but disambiguation should be fine-tuned to differentiate from the other film. Erik (talk) 14:24, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
• Support Per nom - further disambig is needed. Lugnuts (talk) 14:29, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
• Support. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 14:35, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
• Support two films, one title, both should have year film disambig, not just film. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 14:42, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
• Support: Per nom and above and potentially snowball. —Mike Allen 00:22, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

Question: Is it proposed that Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (film) redirect to a specific one of the two films or that it become a disambiguation page? Big Bird (talk • contribs) 14:34, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

I would think that it should either become a disambiguation page or be redirected to Sweeney Todd (disambiguation). BOVINEBOY2008 :) 14:50, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

I would recommend redirecting to Sweeney Todd (disambiguation). One disambiguation page for the related terms is enough. Erik (talk) 15:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

We should also make sure that articles that link to Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (film) are corrected to point to the specific film, depending on which film the link was intended for. Erik (talk) 15:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

That shouldn't be a problem. I can do it once its moved. BOVINEBOY2008 :) 00:06, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (2007 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090115053330/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/film/reviews/article_display.jsp?rid=10285 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/film/reviews/article_display.jsp?rid=10285
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080806231716/http://ap.google.com:80/article/ALeqM5gyhNC8FWQtoG_N7y0gWoKA2PV18gD92B7PLO0 to http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gyhNC8FWQtoG_N7y0gWoKA2PV18gD92B7PLO0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (2007 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fopinion%2F2007%2F05%2F13%2Fdp1301.xml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120205071929/http://www.observer.com/2007/he-s-19-he-s-beautiful-and-he-s-bloody-good to http://www.observer.com/2007/he-s-19-he-s-beautiful-and-he-s-bloody-good
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071211184324/http://www.nbrmp.org/awards/past.cfm?year=2007 to http://www.nbrmp.org/awards/past.cfm?year=2007

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (2007 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071218132534/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/113573.html to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/113573.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080602202136/http://www.sanfranciscosentinel.com/?p=8434 to http://www.sanfranciscosentinel.com/?p=8434
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070125204347/http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/8049 to http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/8049
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071211140114/http://www.suntimes.com/business/689434,CST-FIN-lew10.article to http://www.suntimes.com/business/689434,CST-FIN-lew10.article
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071227024932/http://www.marcustheatres.com/index_sub.cfm?pageid=subpages%2Fsweenytodd.html&CFID=5803576&CFTOKEN=97826629 to http://www.marcustheatres.com/index_sub.cfm?pageid=subpages%2Fsweenytodd.html&CFID=5803576&CFTOKEN=97826629

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

See also

I'm tempted to put ===See also=== Soylent Green (a film where people unwittingly eat processed dead people) but given the importance of this page, I thought I'd discuss it first. Renard Migrant (talk) 19:42, 19 October 2019 (UTC)