 | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is a very uneven article that has a lot of information presented in blocks. It needs to be wikified and cleaned up since there are many grammatical errors too. Also sections need to be consistent with the wikipedia manual. I'll work on it, but please do NOT remove the tags before the work is done. Thanks in advance. --Antorjal 14:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Do not remove the tags.
editPlease do not remove the wikify and cleanup tags until both have been done. What needs to be done is the following:
- A lead paragraph
- A history section (now the whole article is on history)
- economics
- geography and weather
- population and demographics
- media
- CITE references
- copy-editing the whole article because it is replete with grammatical and spelling errors
- There are very few links. That's why I have the wikify tag there too. It just does not coform with the guidelines for the encyclopedia.
Thanks. --Antorjal 13:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- This article is not upto the wikipedia manual please follow WP:INCITIES and WP:MOS. Amartyabag (Talk) 10:42, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Re Tamralipta
editI have moved most of the Tamralipta based content to a separate article and wikified the first two sections of this one. I need to do the other remaining sections. Feel free to help but check for grammar, spelling, accuracy, and linking. Thanks. --Antorjal 01:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Bheema
editApparently, the forthcoming movie is not about the belief referred to in this article. Certainly an entertainment would not be a secure basis for the argument made here. Fconaway 07:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Tamluk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061104210222/http://db.metropolis.it:80/comuni/index99.asp to http://db.metropolis.it/comuni/index99.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:34, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Wrong photo.
editThe photo of the temple is not from TAMLUK but from Chandannagar, Odisha. Invitrosantanu (talk) 12:31, 28 December 2019 (UTC)