| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tarapith article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Tarapith appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 July 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Bamakhepa
editThere's plenty of information out there about Sadhak Bamakhepa (mentioned in several english language books and PLENTY of bengali books.) Perhaps he should have his own article instead of being a sub-set of the Tarapith article? Kobresia (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Re
editBamakhepa has his own page sids 15:53, 20 November 2012 (UTC)talk
Tarapith is not one of 51 pithas
Tarak bhattacharya (talk) 01:49, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Sati - (adishakti?)
editThere is no link to qualify the name 'Sati' — this should be made clear if this is Tara (Adishakti). And should Shakti and Tara be the same entity, it should also be altered. Stjohn1970 (talk) 09:58, 23 May 2023 (UTC)