Talk:Tawaif

Tawaif

"A tawaif is a woman of grace. She dances like a dream and, unlike a sex worker, is skilled." Who says sex workers aren't skilled? Maybe I just don't like the sentence structure... 131.107.0.112 (talk) 18:53, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Umrao Jaan movie poster.jpg

The image Image:Umrao Jaan movie poster.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:36, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

No Rivisionism: do not rewrite history

South Asia does not exist in the source, hence I am replacing it with what the source says (India). South Asia is a new term pushed by Pakistanis and western "multiculturalism" appeasers, this term did not exist at the time of Taiwaif during mughal era or British Raj. Don't try to rewrite history with conjectures, synthesis and cooking up new terms. Only use the terms apt for that era. Pakistan and South Asia did not exist when taiwaif were mainstream. 202.156.182.84 (talk) 05:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Contradiction in the lede

'A tawaif was a highly successful courtesan singer‚ dancer‚ and poet who catered to the nobility of the Indian subcontinent, particularly during the Mughal era. Many tawaifs (nautch girls to the British) were forced to go into prostitution due to a lack of opportunities by the time of the British Raj.'

Excuse me, but 'courtesan' already means prostitute'; defining tawaifs as prostitutes and then claiming that tawaifs only became prostitutes due to lack of opportunities during the British period is logically nonsensical. Besides, the claim that only the evil British made them prostitutes seems like nationalist revisionism. This kind of combination is known from many civilisations, starting from Greek hetaeras; we are apparently supposed to believe that it originally didn't exist anywhere else in the world until evil conquerors came along, because some 'patriots' want to purge their history of all aspects that embarrass them by differing from perfectly Victorian puritan attitudes. Attitudes that were, ironically, imposed on their cultures by those very conquerors. 62.73.69.121 (talk) 23:38, 5 August 2024 (UTC)