Talk:Tawhid

Latest comment: 7 months ago by 86.99.205.30 in topic Strange, unecessary language
Former good article nomineeTawhid was a Philosophy and religion good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 21, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed

Strange, unecessary language

edit

In this it says that "Islam has an uncompromising monotheism that makes it disctinct from other religions". There are other religions that are uncompromisingly monotheistic. This is unecessary and controversy-provoking. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.36.110.61 (talk) 02:38, 20 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

@24.36.110.61 Nothing is wrong. 86.99.205.30 (talk) 23:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Islam has an uncompromising monotheism. Monotheism is a character shared by other major religions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WashPark (talkcontribs) 15:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

The reference to Turner (2006) after the controversial statement "Islam has an uncompromising monotheism [that makes it distinct from other religions -- old language, changed 7/22/11 to -> SOME other major religions -- thank you for that change]: The reference to Turner(2006) is now in question. First the reference is not complete. Who is Turner and what did s/he write? Second if Turner did not say that Islam shares the character of uncompromising monotheism with other major religions, the reference would be in error as it does not back the statement. Since the reader cannot check Turner's writing at this point, I ask that the reference to Turner be removed or completed. WashPark (talk) 21:50, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Etymology

edit

Should there be a section on etymology of the word "Tawheed". I'm trying one. Please list the problems here after I have made my edit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdullah Al Wasif (talkcontribs) 12:27, 2015 April 16 (UTC)

Note from history-merger

edit

'more generally Tahwid is used to connote unification union fusion combination (15)

This is incorrect and will no doubt be used by Trinitarians to support their position.

God is ONE and the meaning has not changed throughout the millenia ! One means one!! Tawhid in Arabic

               Echad in Arabic!

2C0F:F8F0:204:0:5575:57A4:B972:A29F (talk) 10:02, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Out of context and misleading quote

edit

The article currently reads "From an Islamic standpoint, there is an uncompromising monotheism at the heart of the Islamic beliefs (aqidah) which is seen as distinguishing Islam from other major religions." (Turner (2006), p. 75.) While the pronouncement is referenced to Turner, it's actually incorrect as applied to Judaism. See Monotheism#Judaism and Jewish principles of faith#Monotheism. Furthermore, aside from being incorrect, the Turner statement in the article is taken out of context. Here's the full quote from Turner: "There is, as many Western writers have pointed out, an uncompromising monotheism at the heart of the Islamic endeavour which distinguishes Islam from other major religions. This is not to say that, in theory at least, the oneness of God is any less a reality in Christianity and Judaism than it is in Islam. In practice, however, the emphasis on Divine Unity in Muslim theology far outweighs the attention paid to this concept by theologians of other faiths."

In that sentence of Tawhid it's strongly implied that Islam is uncompromisingly monotheistic to the exclusion of Judaism (or Christianity). What Turner actually claims, however, is that uncompromising monotheism, though not unique to Islam, is given greater attention and emphasis than in other faiths.

Instead of revising that above sentence in Tawhid to not be out of context and misleading, it should frankly be deleted. Turner not only lacks firm support for his implication that Judaism doesn't properly believe in Tawhid, but is flat out wrong in his claim. By the millions, when Jews say God is one, it is one in the sense of Tawhid, just as Muslims by the hundreds of millions intend in saying that God is one. No less a religious authority than Maimonides lists as principles essential to Judaism "the existence of God, the absolute unity of God, the incorporeality of God" (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/maimonides/) and devotes tremendous attention to the philosophy of this. Someone reading Tawhid as it's currently written would walk away thinking that Islam is unique in Tawhid, when in fact Jewish and Islamic theology do not differ in this respect.

There are many fundamental differences between Judaism and Islam; Tawhid is not one of them, but a common denominator. Contributor613 (talk) 05:22, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply