Talk:Tekken Tag Tournament 2/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Niemti in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tomcat7 (talk · contribs) 11:26, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- I have hoped to see a good formatted reference style, but the same issues can be encountered in this article. Incorrect publishers, inconsistent date formats, redundant mention of the time, missing parameters, etc.--Tomcat (7) 12:54, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Perfect formatting is not needed for GA at all. --Niemti (talk) 23:34, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Reception could be better but I had no hand in this. --Niemti (talk) 00:16, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- "Features suggested by Katsuhiro Harada include recording" - outdated information?
- "The Wii U Edition will feature an exclusive Mushroom Battle" - also outdated as already released in North America
- The lead does not seem to summarize the article. Perhaps add a few sentences about its marketing/promotion, and perhaps state what exactly was praised.
- Make sure you update the whole article.
- There are several dead links, eg Ref 40.--Tomcat (7) 11:33, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
I must comment that the third image, of the special edition, does not have a proper fair use rationale. The rationale describes the contents of the image, not why it is important. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 04:08, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Tenses updated, lead extended (a bit), image removed, also some more stuff. --Niemti (talk) 22:30, 26 November 2012 (UTC)