Talk:Tekken Tag Tournament 2/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Niemti in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomcat7 (talk · contribs) 11:26, 28 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

  • I have hoped to see a good formatted reference style, but the same issues can be encountered in this article. Incorrect publishers, inconsistent date formats, redundant mention of the time, missing parameters, etc.--Tomcat (7) 12:54, 10 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Perfect formatting is not needed for GA at all. --Niemti (talk) 23:34, 11 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Reception could be better but I had no hand in this. --Niemti (talk) 00:16, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • "Features suggested by Katsuhiro Harada include recording" - outdated information?
  • "The Wii U Edition will feature an exclusive Mushroom Battle" - also outdated as already released in North America
  • The lead does not seem to summarize the article. Perhaps add a few sentences about its marketing/promotion, and perhaps state what exactly was praised.
  • Make sure you update the whole article.
  • There are several dead links, eg Ref 40.--Tomcat (7) 11:33, 21 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

I must comment that the third image, of the special edition, does not have a proper fair use rationale. The rationale describes the contents of the image, not why it is important. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 04:08, 24 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Tenses updated, lead extended (a bit), image removed, also some more stuff. --Niemti (talk) 22:30, 26 November 2012 (UTC)Reply