Talk:The 15:17 to Paris

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I don't understand this deletion. Unlike the other opinions there, this one is of a fellow working for a non-notable thing. With the others, we can better understand the nature of the commentator's status by their in-lined organizational article. Here we are bereft of that. And "but you can click through and learn it" is not a sufficient answer. It is two words. Seriously. You can click through and see for whom the other critics work for, but we don't as a result delete their publication names, and only list their names. --2603:7000:2143:8500:1D36:6FB6:FDDA:9EB2 (talk) 01:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

At the end of the day, I agree with Mathglot - it is a non-RS, just a self-published blog, and should therefore be removed. --2603:7000:2143:8500:94D2:447:CF44:F53 (talk) 00:36, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic