Talk:The Bankers of God: The Calvi Affair

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Italian cinema task force.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move?

Latest comment: 11 years ago6 comments5 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved Mike Cline (talk) 22:32, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Bankers of God: The Calvi Affair → The Bankers of God –

Unnecessary disambiguation; no other films titled The Bankers of God. The latter already redirects to the former. Fortdj33 (talk) 14:04, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
But the subtitle is still technically part of the title, so it's not really disambiguation, just completeness. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 14:20, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Per WP:PRECISE, we should "use only as much additional detail as necessary". The subtitle is unnecessary, if there is no other article or film with that title on Wikipedia. Fortdj33 (talk) 20:00, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

That section you quote is about disambiguation, which is not relevant here. Do we have a guideline about subtitles? Dicklyon (talk) 03:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Unless it can be shown that the film is better known under the short title, I see no reason why we shouldn't use its full title as the article title. Sandstein 12:28, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic