Talk:The Big Moo

this article seems to be completely unsourced

Virtually none of this article can be related back to verifiable sources. I tried to add some but they were deleted. Seems to be all original research I suggest the article is deleted unless it is properly written. Comments? Suggestions? Jamesrand (talk) 05:27, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Article is consistent with sources provided. The original draft was primarily based on the Miami Herald article. Editors must purchase said article for about $3 in order to view it's contents on line.--Nowa (talk) 09:09, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

I am pretty sure this does not qualify as a verifiable source if the editors are required to purchase it. I am putting the proposed deletion tag back in to get more people involved on this decision as I cannot find any other sources (other than the primary source) that support anything in the article. Jamesrand (talk) 15:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Deletion tag cannot be reinserted once removed - I am not sure if this is true if it was removed by the creator of the article but thought it best to respect that until further research is done. Added tags to unsourced information for correction. Jamesrand (talk) 15:13, 26 October 2011 (UTC)