Talk:The Bounty (1984 film)

Copyvio

Possible copyvio, but no big deal. I just read a long review by a university professor or student and recognized several phrases. We should probably give credit for these. I'll try to google it up again. --Uncle Ed 19:35, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

This edit is identical in several paragraphs with this copyrighted web page. So either someone plagiarized Wikipedia, or we did a copyvio. Until I can figure out which copied from which, I think I'll just delete the identical paragraphs. Better safe than sorry. --Uncle Ed 19:54, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Boy will I be embarassed if it turns out they copied from us, because I just cut all but one of the identical paragraphs, and left a link. --Uncle Ed 20:05, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

I wrote the paragraphs originally that were cut out, and I didn't copy them from any other source. I'm pretty sure that these people copied the articles word for word from Wikipedia.
JesseG 18:48, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I put some of it back, but made sure it was not a word for word repition of what's on solar navigator.

JesseG 19:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Lots of POV in this...

Wow... so the mutiny was all about carnal sex? That's not accurate. It was more complicated than that. It was also about love. I mean, these guys started a new colony... what, for sex? So the captain did "just as any other captain would do"? NO... he continuously risked the lives of his men for his own glory and became increasingly mad at sea... remember, the whole "rounding the Horn"(Cape Horn, South America) part? How about that being a GREAT motivator for mutiny instead of this sexual motivation you are dishing out in this POV entry. This entry does not represent the movie. It's someone's slanted opinion of it; missing fact after fact that would allow the reader to have more balanced and accurate info in regards to the movie. It's like the writer didn't see the movie.

Fair use rationale for Image:The bounty 1984.jpg

Image:The bounty 1984.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Round The Horn

Regarding whether the mutiny was sparked by Bligh wanting to go past Cape Horn.

From his own writings: "It was proposed that our route to the Society Islands should be round Cape Horn;" So the route was supposed to be from UK past Cape Horn to Tahiti. So going West all the way.

This makes perfectly sense, and will not impact any breadfruits as these would not be onboard at the time of passage.

However, the problem was that due to the seasonal weather it was impossible for Bligh to actually pass the Horn. And his repeated attempts certainly caused anguish amongst his crew, thereby fuelling what was later to become the mutiny.

Through it would be fair to say that the attempts to pass the Horn did not directly cause the mutiny - I believe it is incorrect to state that it was a historical error that they did not have an effect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.59.206.86 (talk) 14:01, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

I see where the confusion comes from. Bligh's orders were to enter the Pacific via the shortest route, westwards round the Horn. He knew it was too late in the season so he requested orders to allow him the discression to take the longer easterly route. On the voyage out Bligh spent a whole month battered by westerly gales trying to round the Horn to get into the Pacific. In the end in accordance with his discretionary orders he turned east for the Cape of Good Hope then Tasmania. That much is historical fact. What is fiction is a scene in the film when, after the breadfruit trees have been loaded, Bligh decides to round the Horn Eastwards to get into the Atlantic, supposedly because of his ambition to circumnavigate the globe, mentioned earlier in the film. What the filmmakers were trying to suggest was that, having been batterered by the Horn once, the mention of a second attempt on the Horn aroused dread in the crew which added to the crew's disquiet immediately preceeding the the mutiny. It is only the proposed second attempt on the Horn which is fictional. Petecarney (talk) 12:45, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Fiddler

Does anybody know, who plays the fiddle in this movie? I suspect it's Frankie Gavin, but the man's face is well hidden.--Ginness (talk) 07:27, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Plot

This article's plot summary violates WP:FILMPLOT in a number of ways: first, it is entirely too long, at more than 1,000 words, when the policy calls for a 400-700 word summary; second, it is filled with opinion and analysis of the events and motives of the characters, as well as comparison to other film versions; third, there are repeated references to the film-as-film, when it should be a straight, succinct, recitation of the events. Put simply, it is a mess and needs to be completely rewritten. ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 02:09, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Historical errors

The list of historical errors must be substantiated with reliable sources and should contain neither opinions about what might not be plausible nor any interpretation of second-hand information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.64.48.38 (talk) 12:14, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on The Bounty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141231065448/http://lean.bfi.org.uk/material.php?theme=2&title=bounty to http://lean.bfi.org.uk/material.php?theme=2&title=bounty
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120902115419/http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?_r=1&res=9C05E6D9143AF937A35756C0A962948260&oref=slogin to http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?_r=1&res=9C05E6D9143AF937A35756C0A962948260&oref=slogin

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:42, 29 August 2015 (UTC)