Talk:The Dreamers (2003 film)

Comments from 2005-2007

must the reference really be to "soft and supple" breasts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.133.237 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 26 December 2005

I think a disambiguation page is needed for this page, to distinguish this, Bertolucci's The Dreamers from Orson Welles' unfinished film of the same name. Driller thriller 03:01, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I think there's also a David Eddings book series called the Dreamers. Probably more stuff too. Maybe a disambiguation page would come in handy. Andral 17:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm removing the reference to Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, as the film wasn't released until the year after this movie is set. If someone can cite a specific anachronistic reference, however, feel free to put it back in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.215.143.246 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 1 October 2006

Thanks 58.106.99.100, you beat me to it, removing the very POV comments NeilUK 17:39, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:The Dreamers movie.jpg

Image:The Dreamers movie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Louvre record time from "Bande à part"

As nitpicky as this is, the Louvre record time from "Bande à part" is 9 minutes, 43 seconds, not 9 minutes, 45 seconds. The 9:45 mark was the record (set by "Jimmy Johnson of San Francisco") that the characters in "Bande à part" broke. Xopher 12:30, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Strange format redirections?

I seem to remember the film and book previously having their own articles. Why would the book article redirect to the filmarticle, but still be name "(film)" and be written as though it is just about the film? A similar thing seems to have happened with the Bent article, with the film redirecting to the play article, without the article including the information about the film or changing the page title to reflect this. Very odd! --Jackdavinci (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, that is strange. I thought I rememebered The Holy Innocents (book) article actually containing information, but the history includes only the redirect. I don't know, but I certainly believe the book should have its own article. -- Chickenmonkey ^X  sign?  —Preceding comment was added at 01:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Wait... is it even possible for conjoined twins to be male and female? Aren't conjoined twins categorically monozygotic? 70.253.142.79 (talk) 15:16, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

English primary language

The primary language spoken in the film is English, though French and English are spoken interchangeably throughout.
Is this really a reference to the original language of the movie or a dubbed version? 78.48.224.232 (talk) 21:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC)