Talk:The Gathering (2003 film)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Minicarmen in topic Shouldn’t the title be 2002, not 2003?

Fair use rationale for Image:The Gathering film.jpg

edit
 

Image:The Gathering film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Plot Synopsis is FAR too long

edit

Would whomever felt the need to write the overlong plot sysnopsis consider paring it down to a a simple paragraph before others do it for you? Usually when overly long plot synopses appear in an article, they get truncated in ways the original writer might not prefer. I've seen the film myself and feel that it could be better represented here. In fact, the critcal reaction was NOT that one-sided. A better article could be written but I'm unfortunately otherwise engaged. LiPollis (talk) 09:59, 2 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Shouldn’t the title be 2002, not 2003?

edit

The title says it’s a 2003 film, while the first line of the article and IMDB.com say it’s a 2002 film. Maybe there’s a difference in the completed date vs. the date released, but whatever’s going on, it’s confusing. Minicarmen (talk) 03:19, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply