Talk:The Good Huswifes Jewell
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Spudlace in topic Rosewater!
 | The Good Huswifes Jewell has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 6, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Good Huswifes Jewell/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 13:59, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Will get to this in a day or two. Superb one, as always! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 13:59, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking this on! Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- In Lead:
- Would be good to add a word about who Dawson is although you link him.
- Added a gloss. Chiswick Chap (talk)
- In Context:
- with for example locally-grown Should this not use commas like "with, for example, locally-grown" ?
- Just curious, does "Medieval" mean the same as "Middle Ages" here? Can we use any one term?
- It's basically the only available adjective for "of the Middle Ages". Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- In Overview:
- In the first few lines, it should be clear that "he" refers to the author.
- Said "Dawson". Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- In Approach:
- Is the term "goal" is linked to not a bit too technical for our purpose?
- Removed link. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- The "hearbes" link in the quote is a duplicate.
- Removed link. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- In Reception:
- Elizabethan is linked twice, and both are duplinks.
- Removed links. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Who is Opaskar?
- Glossed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Link violet a bit earlier, at first mention.
That should be it. An interesting read, would make a great GA. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 09:23, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Cool, ready for promotion! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 15:18, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Rosewater!
editIf rosewater is that unfamiliar today, how come I can buy it by the bottle in supermarkets and even corner shops? Stub Mandrel (talk) 15:36, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
- I changed this to "ingredients that are uncommon in modern cooking". They are familiar and not difficult to find at shops but they are not commonly used. Modern cookbooks only infrequently include a recipe with rosewater but some Middle Eastern cookbooks still use it. Spudlace (talk) 06:43, 25 October 2021 (UTC)