Talk:The Greater Good (Lost)

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Keith D in topic Centralized move discussion

Centralized move discussion

edit

This article has been renamed from The Greater Good to The Greater Good (Lost) as the result of a move request.

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was - for consistency with other episodes of Lost as this is a common expression. Keith D (talk) 17:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Per WP:LOST/Episode guidelines, this page should be moved from The Greater Good to The Greater Good (Lost), to make it consistent with the other Lost episodes at Category:Lost episodes. Anyone interested in supporting or opposing this move, or who believes that a different suffix should be used (such as "(Lost episode)"), or who wishes to comment in any way, is encouraged to participate at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Lost/Episode guidelines#Name suffix. --Elonka 14:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Given that "The Greater Good" is a commonly-used expression, rather than just the title of a Lost episode, I suggest this article gets moved to The Greater Good (Lost) and The Greater Good be modified into a redirect to Greater Good. If there are no objections I will perform this move on 2008-02-25.-- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 11:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
I can't move the page, as The Greater Good (Lost) already exists, as a redirect to The Greater Good, so I have made a request for administrator assistance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JediLofty (talkcontribs) 10:49, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Support. Also Greater Good should be moved to Greater good. Cross porpoises (talk) 19:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Comment - I've performed the Greater Good -> Greater good move (I could do that as it didn't require that I be an admin!). I'm wondering if the move request should have been placed in the Uncontroversial proposals section. -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 15:25, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • Support the move and the redirect change per WP:NC(P) which recommends "adding a parethical (bracketed) disambiguator to the page name: for instance when both spellings are often or easily confused." In this case, only the article separates the two. — AjaxSmack 23:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.