Baboon grooming

edit

In more than 10,000 edits over more than two years, that's actually my first barnstar given for a real and honest reason (I think I got another one once for just existing). I've long since come to the conclusion that 98% of barnstars are given out as social signals by social WP climbers, a lot like baboon-grooming. Some of the worst admins I've ever seen, have whole pages of them. But again, thanks for one that I'm sure isn't one of THOSE. SBHarris 17:07, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bugaboo (The Flea)

edit

Hello JediLofty, thank you very much for taking the time to contact me.

The reason way I moved Bugaboo (The Flea) was because I placed it with the other Quicksilva games released in 1983. To simply put it, the games are to go in order by year of release (1983) then by publisher (Quicksilva) and alphabetically (B). Complicated? Yeah I agree, but I soon got used to it and I hope you'll soon get used to it as well when adding new games. I hope you understand my reason, it's not a matter of doing something wrong, it's only logical and I'm just meeting guidelines. It's all I can do really.

The page itself is an ongoing one will loads of games still to be added in. I appreciate your work in adding a game that we missed earlier. I am currently working to improve the page, but if you wish to help out then I give you my blessing and if you need any further inquiries on this topic, please do not hesitate to contact me and I'll be glad to assist.

Thanks again and take care. Raphie (talk) 13:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC) ==Reply

Ok me again, I'm just gonna give you an example of how a new game should by listed in the List of ZX Spectrum games page. Say a made up game, Rage of the Animals, Wikisoft, 1990. First look for the 1990 column, then look at the list and you'll see the games are in order of publisher, so just go to W and slot Wikisoft in between Virgin Games and Your Sinclair. Then if Wikisoft had more then one release in 1990, (say Vandal Busters), then place Rage of the Animals above Vandal Busters and PRESTO! you have added a new game to the list. Hope you'll find this helpful when adding new games. Raphie (talk) 14:03, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wizadora

edit

Amazing. Bumble around the interweb and you're bound to run into someone you know! Although quite how two southern fruitie addicts ended up at Wizadora I shall leave best unasked. VonBlade (talk) 19:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC) (feel free to edit this out once read)Reply

Michael Starr (playwright)

edit

Hello! While I am usually not in the habit of provoking 6'7" blokes, I can say that I decided to remove the speedy delete tag for two reasons: (1) primarily, I was able to locate some information on the subject (as Michael Starr) via Google, and (2) the article is a bit on the old side and I felt that either AfD or a Prod would have been more suitable. The article does state that referencing is needed (the tag is at the bottom of the piece -- I will move it back to where it belongs). I hope this is a satisfactory explanation. If not, then please give me at least 30 seconds for a good running head start. Cheers! Ecoleetage (talk) 15:36, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey, on the Internet you can be whatever you want to be! Why be a wimp when you can be a ferocious bully? :) With the article's subject, try Googling "Michael Starr" -- a few things pop up. Not much, admittedly, but I did say that his notability was "marginal" (he's not Harold Pinter, by any stretch). In generally, I believe it is best form for older articles like the Starr piece to go to AfD for erasure -- I often dig through the WP:Backlog in search of old muck. In any event, I've enjoyed making your acquaintance and I hope to see you online again soon!

The template you're looking for

edit

Is indeed the {{notaforum}} template. Simply use the parameter to specify your required message after the words "This is not a forum for general discussion of..." So you might use something like {{|notaforum|voice cast, how much you hate the character designs, the new interpretations of Transformer biology or how this movie "isn't Transformers"}}. Only, y'know, something even more entertainingly snide. Steve TC 11:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

In view of your recent Wikipedia contributions...

edit

Hello! I hope you don't mind, but I took a look through your recent contributions to Wikipedia and I thought you were deserving of commendation. Please accept this as a token of my appreciation for your Wiki input:

  The Original Barnstar
In view of your cogent contributions to expanding the depth and scope of Wikipedia's content.Ecoleetage (talk) 13:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, there is a first time for everything! Be well. Ecoleetage (talk) 13:48, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

DYK

edit
  On 19 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Watch Your Own Heart Attack, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Jordan Contribs 07:37, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply


Paddock Wood

edit

As well as removing road information you state that congestion is 'Original Research'. The A21 in the area does have traffic problems! FM talk to me | show contributions ]  19:58, 22 September 2008 (UTC) Reply

 
Hello, JediLofty. You have new messages at Freakmighty's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dave on Virgin TV

edit

Right now Dave is on Virgin Channel 126 but on the 7th of October Gold will have that channel number - Info from the G.O.L.D web site so Dave will need to move to an new channel number and 128 and 129 will be free. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamhillwill (talkcontribs) 08:50, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Grambling T Dominique, Jr.

edit

Hello, Jedi Lofty, I'm new to wikipedia and i'm a Sport's reporter for KO Magazine, and a exiciting boxer that has been getting a little "pub" lately has come accross my desk. I was unaware that Boxx Faxx Magazine wrote an article on this fighter until I read the Deletion Page posted. (By the way, your conclusions were all incorrect about this fighter) however, I wish to continue to finsh my article and I have verifiable facts of his history in this game as well, so feel free to contact me again, and again, I'm sorry if I started a new incident here. I will include all "ref-points" in my article for wikipedia's review. Thank you. 15:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC)15:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC) Sport's Rec. ( also I see that Box Rec has removed this fighter from it's ranks, due to his being stripped of his title). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sports Rec (talkcontribs)

Hello Jody, again I would like to express my opinion on you request to have my user page, Grambling T Dominique, Jr., deleted. This boxer is remarkable, and I do not know User Boxx Faxx, However I am aware of the Magazine. I report on boxers and I want to do an independant piece on this boxer. He is well published and as you can see my article is still "under construction", as I am still gathering all my facts. Please allow me to do that. My user page is the begenning of my fact finding quest and as you well know several so-called boxing sites are unreliable with bad information, and they disclose this on there sites as well. I want to ensure the editors that this addition well be "an addition" to wikipedia. Thk You.10:50, 23 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sports Rec (talkcontribs)

Hey there!

edit

Good to hear from you -- hope all is well. I replied to your message on that AfD. Thanks for the input -- I always join reading your contributions. Ecoleetage (talk) 16:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Have you ever seen the two infamous rip-off versions of the Lucas classic, "The Turkish Star Wars" and "The Brazilian Star Wars"? The films are hilariously awful -- it makes the "Holiday Special" look sublime in comparison. Hope all is well -- may the Force be with you! Ecoleetage (talk) 13:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

M&M's World

edit

Hi JediLofty

Just noticed that you removed the gallery of photos from M&M's World, I understand and agree it does not bring any encyclopedic facts to the article but it does not harm either. The photos are here to illustrate a place that not everyone can have the chance to visit. It is a real plus for levering the quality of any article especially if the photos are nice, I personally like to find such in articles I am going through. Would you mind to revert that change? Richieman (talk) 15:51, 28 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

The article will most likely grow up and the gallery would then make sense (and anyway illustrates the subject as some galleries do for example for buildings and skyscrapers). Could you let me know where in WP:SPAM there is an argument against such addition to articles? Anyway do not be so strict else the "wiki spirit" may get lost and the contributors leave with it. I added a link within the articles to the Wikicommons category, hope it is fine with you. Richieman (talk) 19:25, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Would you care to elaborate on how you think they fail WP:MUSIC? I think it's pretty clear that they at least meet the general notability guidelines with multiple reliable sources present. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 16:47, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Father Christmas sent me...

edit

3D Lunattack

edit

Hi JediLofty, just wanted to let you know that I've merged your excellent work with 3D Lunattack to Seiddab Trilogy, since I think that all the information on these games will fit comfortably in one article. I also invite you to perhaps expand on this subject. Thanks, Marasmusine (talk) 18:25, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speccy list

edit
  The VG Barnstar
This is a collective barnstar to everyone (Frodet, Miremare, JediLofy, Raphie and myself) who helped fill out the sortable List of ZX Spectrum games. It took over a year, on and off, but it's more or less done! Thanks Marasmusine (talk) 00:10, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Athelston Williams

edit

I have nominated Athelston Williams, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athelston Williams. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. J Milburn (talk) 00:25, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

NowCommons: File:Habitrail OVO.jpg

edit

File:Habitrail OVO.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Habitrail OVO.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Habitrail OVO.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:05, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:TF1986Screenshot.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:TF1986Screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:53, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Service awards proposal

edit
  Hello, JediLofty! I noticed you display a service award, and would like to invite you to join the discussion over a proposed revamping of the awards.

If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — the Man in Question (in question) 19:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Turmoil Spectrum Screenshot.gif

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Turmoil Spectrum Screenshot.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:31, 31 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Main page appearance

edit

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on July 3, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 3, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article directors Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 18:17, 29 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rob Paravonian

edit
 

The article Rob Paravonian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to pass WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nouniquenames 18:30, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of User:JediLofty/Pinning

edit

User:JediLofty/Pinning, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:JediLofty/Pinning and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:JediLofty/Pinning during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 17:44, 8 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Serverware Racing for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Serverware Racing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serverware Racing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QueenCake (talk) 21:13, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:AotKT ZX Spectrum Screenshot.gif

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:AotKT ZX Spectrum Screenshot.gif. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 22:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Full Throttle ZX Spectrum Screenshot.gif

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Full Throttle ZX Spectrum Screenshot.gif. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 22:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:3D Lunattack ZX Spectrum Screenshot.gif

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:3D Lunattack ZX Spectrum Screenshot.gif. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 22:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Saboteur II Spectrum Screenshot.gif

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Saboteur II Spectrum Screenshot.gif. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 22:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Monty is Innocent (ZX Spectrum Screenshot).gif

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Monty is Innocent (ZX Spectrum Screenshot).gif. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 22:08, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Monty is Innocent (Loading Screen).gif

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Monty is Innocent (Loading Screen).gif. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 22:08, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KILO Logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:KILO Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 21 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, JediLofty. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, JediLofty. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Swamp Thing (truck)

edit
 

The article Swamp Thing (truck) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable; can find no reliable independent sources to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sable232 (talk) 21:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Advanced Warriors for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Advanced Warriors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Warriors until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

OceanHok (talk) 16:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:The Collection (Ugly Kid Joe Album).jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:The Collection (Ugly Kid Joe Album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply