Talk:The Hottie and the Nottie

Discussion

Removed "It is rumored that shooting had to be stopped several times due to unexplained sightings of Jesus begging cast and crew to stop filming and for the taped footage to be destroyed." - I'm assuming it was vandalism, besides,I saw nothing on the Jesus page about this... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.49.177.237 (talk) 09:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Umm, is it just me, or is this article, the "Synopsis" in particular, not really in like with the way Wikipedia is supposed to write its articles? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vor'Cha (talk • contribs) 08:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

The story part needs extreme work, but I'm not stupid enough to go anywhere near this film. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.232.240.76 (talk) 18:56, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

I move for deletion, based on the premise that we must, at long last, have a sense of decency. MWShort (talk) 18:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

So we delete things we don't like, rather than acknowledge their historical relevance? This film had a huge amount of press and set its place in history. So we just pretend it didn't exist? If other films aren't here, they probably just haven't been entered. Unless we are going decide on personal tastes. In that case, I don't like Lima Beans. Let's delete them from the encyclopedia?Bsteph1 (talk) 05:14, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

It really seems like the majority of this article was written by a shill. The plot synopsis is not matter of fact, and the DVD features are listed perfectly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.32.16.100 (talk) 03:28, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm taking this out: "The story contains flashbacks to a shaky handicam video shot in night vision of his best friend having sex with Cristabel in a seedy hotel room. Finding the video in June's drawer makes him realize that she was the right person for him all along." As much as I hate to admit I actually watched this film, I did, and that did not happen - it is just mildly amusing vandalism. Omgplz (talk) 22:13, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Movie for deletion? First of all, it has its place in history (even if mostly for its poor performance). Secondly, believe it or not, there are people who loved it! I for one found it hilarious. Luckily, I did not read the reviews. The ending made me cry. It all depends on the mood and context. If you hate Paris, you might hate the movie. If you want some entertainment on a darker day, it might just be great :) --- and Christine Lakin in her Jekyll and Hyde part deserves an Oscar! :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.89.193.9 (talk) 03:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

I have to say that I think the over-exposure of the bad reviews on this film is highly unprofessional and is stated merely for humor purposes. I personally am in extreme shock at the information about this film, I've seen it on all kinds of lists pairing it with films like Son of the Mask and Pluto Nash and it is NOTHING like those films. It is a great movie, it made me laugh, and most importantly, it made me shed so many tears at the end, and the directing style was fantastic (especially for the romantic night scenes.) It may have won Razzies and had many negative reviews, but this isn't a review website, it's a encyclopedia. I say the film needs to have a fairer light that wouldn't ruin the career of the writers/directors.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Hottie and the Nottie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081206010017/http://www.nypost.com:80/photos/galleries/entertainment/pp_20081201_top_ten_worst_movies/photo09.htm to http://www.nypost.com/photos/galleries/entertainment/pp_20081201_top_ten_worst_movies/photo09.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:13, 16 January 2016 (UTC)