Talk:The Inbetweeners 2/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 20:50, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Oh well, someone needs to do this, I guess ;) I hope to be able to review it this weekend. Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:50, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Everything that bothered me, I took care of myself. So it's a pass. Congratulations! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC)