Talk:The Inbetweeners 2

The Inbetweeners 2 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 20, 2015. (Reviewed version).

A fact from The Inbetweeners 2 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 July 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the director of the Australian-set film The Inbetweeners 2 considered filming it in South Africa in order to save money?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Inbetweeners 2.

Wikipedia

Film: Australian / British

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales / South Australia / Queensland / Sydney Low‑importance

	Australia portal The Inbetweeners 2 is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales, or the State Library of Queensland, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Plot

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

First of all. It is over long. And per WP:FILMPLOT, it should be between 400 and 700 words. And since when did Wikipedia ever show images in the plot from the film itself? They aren't even neatly put in, and it looks a little messy. I think they should all go, or just two of them. But the plot needs to cut down. If anyone wants to do so, feel free to. Or I will myself Charlr6 (talk) 17:38, 7 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

I removed the images per policy and removed jokey trivial bits in the plot. A bit more to do though! '''tAD''' (talk) 18:09, 7 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Inbetweeners 2/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 20:50, 15 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Oh well, someone needs to do this, I guess ;) I hope to be able to review it this weekend. Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:50, 15 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Everything that bothered me, I took care of myself. So it's a pass. Congratulations! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic