Talk:The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

is graduation degree is compulsary?

I want to ask that is graduation is compulsary to become a CA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4060:296:265B:F94B:7C22:EA3D:4FCC (talk) 10:52, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

No it's not Kanishka060 (talk) 17:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Changes in ICAI Examination

The Section of Examination has discussion about CRET changes expected in 2022. Though the matter has been in discussion and news the exact statements made here do not have any backing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.161.52.90 (talk) 04:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

New policy introduction by ICAI

ICAI has introduced the new policy for foundation, intermediate and final examination. Kanishka060 (talk) 17:00, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: rajkot-icai.org/icai-motto. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Geardona (talk to me?) 14:11, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Regarding recent reversal

@MrOllie I just added the Publications of the Institute.

I don't think there was a need of reversal of that.

Can you specify the reason for that? જય જલારામ (talk) 17:05, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

As I stated in the edit summary, You added a bunch of improper inline external links, and a bunch of unencyclopedic text sourced only to the organizations web site. Both of those things merit a revert. MrOllie (talk) 17:08, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

How else do you refer the Publication of the concerned Institute? જય જલારામ (talk) 17:10, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Listen, the ICAI (the subject of the Page) issues Standards for Accounting and Auditing in Consultation with NFRA in case of Corporate Matters, and in consultation with Government of India in matters of Non-Corporate matters.

It's not an institute of an Author etc.

And Guidance notes are Published for Professional Accountants by independent Committees/ Boards of the Institute.

What other "reliable" sources can you get for that? જય જલારામ (talk) 17:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

If you can show a better "encyclopedic" way of presenting that, then do it.

Or else, let me reverse the reversal. જય જલારામ (talk) 17:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

This isn't a place to paste in a bunch of links to the Insitute or make copies of their materials, they have their own website for that. Use independent, secondary sources. We care what others say about the Institute, not what it has to say about itself. MrOllie (talk) 17:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

The guidance notes and standards are issued by Institute for it's members.

I don't think others can have a say in it.

Also, even before my edit, the Page included data about other standards, and a link to ICAI Act, and ICAI Regulations in references.

So would you delete that too?

(There was a recent dispute between NFRA and ICAI about Auditing Standards, so can I include that?) જય જલારામ (talk) 17:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

If others don't comment on it, it doesn't belong in this article. There is a lot of stuff on this article that ought to be removed - that it hasn't been (yet) is not a reason to improperly add more primary-sourced clutter. MrOllie (talk) 17:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

So Wikipedia is a Gossip website?

There's a whole Government body you don't want their data to be Published of.

This is lamententable. જય જલારામ (talk) 17:33, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

If by a Gossip website you mean that Wikipedia is a website that summarizes what secondary sources have to say, yes. That is what our core content policies (such as WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:NPOV, and so on) require. MrOllie (talk) 17:56, 14 November 2024 (UTC)