Talk:The King's Speech/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Swarm in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Swarm X 08:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Detailed comments follow this list.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
No information on soundtrack or film score.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
One non-free image has incorrect licensing information.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Pass
- Pass/Fail: Pass
Before it can be listed, there are some issues:
- The image of the French movie poster (File:Affiche The King's Speech.jpg) has a free license. The source given is AlloCiné. Proper licensing information and a fair use rationale needs to be added.
- I nominated the other file for deletion from commons, and re-uploaded it to wikipedia with the correct licensing and rationale. Ktlynch (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- There's not much on the film's score or soundtrack. Nothing serious, but some information on these should be added to the article. Ktlynch (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- A 'see also' section should be added. Ktlynch (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
I'll place the review on hold until these issues are resolved. Swarm X 09:36, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. I've added a see also section with a stray link which didn't fit elsewhere, though I can't think of anything else that needs to be linked, I've put a bit of thought into wikifying the article properly. There's now a new section on the score. Music is not my strong suite, so if other editors over it and introduce some technical terms I'd be grateful. I'm off to justify the other film poster now. --Ktlynch (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Nice job, couldn't have hoped for better. We've got ourselves a good article. Swarm X 13:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Listed Swarm X 14:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- Nice job, couldn't have hoped for better. We've got ourselves a good article. Swarm X 13:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)