This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The King's Speech article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I believed it best to delete the paragraph with Žižek's comments as they weren't important in relation to the film on a global critical scale. This is not to dispute his significance in certain philosophical and cultural-criticism circles, but it didn't seem that his particular observations (versus others) should be included in a general article on the film, as he wasn't a noted film critic, and his scholarly observations held no more weight than others of similar reputation.
If the general article were to have a significant section on academic criticism and evaluation of the film, then Žižek's opinions would have their place alongside those of other scholars. However, it does not, so the inclusion of his alone appears biased, odd, and needlessly esoteric. 71.191.155.113 (talk) 07:39, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
