A fact from The Last Policeman appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 March 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The book is a police procedural, with some elements of conspiracy theories and apocalypse, but it is "hard science fiction" in that, as the article states. the described asteroid and its predicted effects are correct. As for it being "soft" because it deals with soft sciences of sociology or psychology, none of the characters I remember were professional or amateur social scientists, just policemen, a pathologist, junkies, crooks, and random characters. So i suggest we just call it "science fiction," unless there are reliable sources (not personal blogs or mirrors of Wikipedia) calling it "soft" science fiction. Edison (talk) 04:04, 5 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Fine. i had classified it that way from a misunderstanding of the concept, since it was more of a character-driven story than one driven by the underlying science. Daniel Case (talk) 14:40, 7 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
