Talk:The Living Dead (TV series)

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: British / Documentary

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Removal of "unreferenced" tag

Latest comment: 17 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

It's a documentary. I am going on VHS recordings and memory (I lost the first episode). Putting a "reference" tag on articles like this is a surreal waste of time. The reference is the programme that the article is about! Garrick92 14:20, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've expanded the descriptions a bit, and put the episodes in the correct order. The latter can be verified on the BBC's online catalogue. I need to run off copies of the series for a relative this week, so should be able to add a bit more, once I've refreshed my memory. Nick Cooper 14:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oooh, I didn't know that existed! I'm going to have a look at that myself, now.Garrick92 16:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Access comes in goes, but it's certainly very useful when it's available. Be aware, though, that the further back you go, the less complete it is, i.e. you can see what was on BBC1 & BBC2 and at what time on any given day in 1999, but 1959 a) won't have everything, and b) won't have programme times. Nick Cooper 16:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Someone's put the "unreferenced" tag back again. I'm removing it again, for the reasons outlined above. Obviously, I'm being mildly obsessive, but am I being unreasonable here? Garrick92 15:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic