 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Possibly Edited?
editI don't remember Mammy Two-Shoes being part of the cartoon, so is it possible she could have been excised altogether? WAVY 10 23:23, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
I remember tom being burned up and looking black, and they edit it out now. I'm not sure if its this ep, but the screenshot seems to make it so.
Fair use rationale for Image:The Mouse Comes To DinnerTitle.JPG
edit
Image:The Mouse Comes To DinnerTitle.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
PLOT
editI have added Plot again , per WP:FILMPLOT films are primary sources and WP:V are relaxed here, editors are welcome to summarize the plot --DBigXray 15:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Moved from User talk:DBigXray- Read it again, "The plot summary is an overview of the film's main events, so avoid minutiae like dialogue, scene-by-scene breakdowns, and technical detail" And then self revert. I added a source, the only one I could find. The rest goes till sourcing is found. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:55, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed, but in my opinion it makes sense to summarize the plot as the maintainance template on the Plot section says. Altogether removal of plot just because it is a complete story is not recommended--DBigXray 15:57, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Which is entirely irrelevant. The policy on both is quite clear, and you know how I am regarding sourcing. Find sources for that crap or I will remove it again. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Per WP:FILMPLOT Since films are primary sources in their articles, basic descriptions of their plots are acceptable without reference to an outside source. Ill ask for copy editing of the plot to make it fit as a basic description I hope this is acceptable to you.--DBigXray 16:10, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
UPDATE: I have asked for Copy Editing here so someone will soon clean and replace with a better written plot. till then relax everyone. --DBigXray 16:50, 22 June 2012 (UTC)