Talk:The Proclamation of Dušan's Law Codex
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Proclamation of Dušan's Law Codex article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The Proclamation of Dušan's Law Codex has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 27, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Proclamation of Dušan's Law Codex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mgb.org.yu/srp/legati/lgpaja/lpj307.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Proclamation of Dušan's Law Codex/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Happy to review. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 17:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Impressive work. Here are my comments:
- Lead:
- As the article is in English, I think it would be more proper to say The Proclamation of Dušan's Law Codex (Serbian: Proglašenje Dušanovog zakonika). Possibly we can do the same for note "a".
- Historical background:
- most powerful and able rulers I hope the NPOV is not challenged when you say "able". What do the sources say?
- Link "Serb" in the first line, not the second.
- Can we link or explain "law codex"?
- Preparation and composition:
- Can you add a word on who Svetozar Gvozdić was, as you do for Milan Kapetanović? This is a redlink.
- The Coronation of Tsar Dušan (Krunisanje Cara Dušana) "The Coronation of Tsar Dušan (Serbian: Krunisanje Cara Dušana)"
- Dušan's German mercenaries, who line the doors of the church as he exits It should be clear that you are referring to the situation in the painting.
- The painting was done en plein air. Would be good to add a word on what the term means here itself, as per [1].
Rest looks good. No copyvio detected, images look fine and are properly licensed. The above points addressed, I would be glad to promote this. Cheers! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 04:05, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- All done. Thanks for the review! 23 editor (talk) 22:31, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. I think the article is ready for promotion now. Excellent job! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 04:19, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- All done. Thanks for the review! 23 editor (talk) 22:31, 26 April 2016 (UTC)