Talk:The Serpent's Egg (film)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Information in various languages
editThis article has information in various languages, I have translated some, but I am unsure for others. Please, someone translate the remaining information. --Francisco Valverde 17:18, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:The Serpent's Egg.jpg
edit
Image:The Serpent's Egg.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
#c-BetacommandBot-2007-10-25T01:07:00.000Z-Fair_use_rationale_for_Image:The_Serpent's_Egg.jpg){kind=link}
Just what is a "Hollywood" film?
editI was rather amused to see the completely bewildering statement This was Ingmar Bergman's one and only "Hollywood" film. What relevance does this have? Making it even less relevant, this is considered a Stub. Please explain just what is meant by this statement and include a reason why it should even be allowed to remain. (Other than a filler for a cut-n-paste article from IMDB.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.17.204.1 (talk) 19:01, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Detail
editIs it clear that Manuela has actually become a prostitute? If memory serves me well, all we have to attest to that is her say-so towards the end of the film - and that is quickly put in doubt: she may have concocted a story to mask her return to religion. Feketekave (talk) 21:15, 5 September 2015 (UTC)