Talk:The Source

Fixes

They need to fix this page. Whoever wrote most of it is straight-up illiterate.

five mics

Can we get a full listing of all the albums that recieved 5 mics?

• I'll add it at the bottom, above "See Also" in its own section, but feel free to move it if that isn't a good place for it. Blingice 22:05, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
• Whew, ok, I added the list. I'll probably add year of release as well. I'll be both 1. pissed and 2. put off if this is deleted, because the list is verifiable in many places on the internet (and I'm pretty sure my source is valid...) and further it took me a ton of time to do. If you do anything, move it on to its own page, because a list like this ought to exist. --Blingice 23:02, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

• In a recent issue of The Source Magazine discussing the odds on who would earn (recieve) the next five mic album status, they listed Boogie Down Production's "Edutainment" as a five mic album. Shouldn't this be added? Because while there is no specific review of the album by The Source declaring it a five mic album, the same can be said for any album prior to "Illmatic" (the first album to garner the status upon release) and a handful of albums later listed as five mic albums by The Source. If these albums are included on the list of Source certified classic albums, Edutainment seems to have just as much right to be on this list as well. No? I won't add it myself, because frankly I don't know what I'm doing well enough, and I don't know if anyone agrees. I also don't have the edition with me.

• Can we separate the 5 mic albums into two categories, one for albums that were originally given 5 mics and ones that were retroactively? The Majority of the albums on the list were given 5 mics retroactively, either because they came out before the magazine was published or because history has looked more favorably on them. If my memory serves me, Illmatic was the first album to get a true 5 mics, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.76.101 (talk) 00:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

• Did Edutainment receive five mics as its article says? MasahiroHayamoto (talk) 19:10, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I think Breaking atoms was the first 5 mics album I remember, nonetheless it was not Illmatic. But I agree the retroactive should be left off. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.231.249.137 (talk) 21:05, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

• When did "What Thee Album" get 5 Mics?! I got the issue of it getting 4.5 but not 5 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Digga2k6 (talk • contribs) 03:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Beef?

Can someone better explain the "Beef/Beef II" DVD problem, as it is very unclear. Also the rumor that David Mays is Lil Kim's manager?

• There was a movie called Beef 2 and had featured the on-going feud between Benzino and Eminem. The DVD was to be released with coverage of the situation! The magazine threatened legal action on Image Entertainment to prevent the movie from being seen. The Source wanted to delete 25 minutes worth of detailed information about the magazine. Also to make it clear that the DVD practically poked fun of Benzino's talent.

• Lil' Kim's The Naked Truth was the first album from a female MC judge for the co-vert "five mics". The album was backlogged before the artist was to serve her sentence in prison. The rumor or comfirmed fact of the matter on how she earned the high rating: Lil' Kim has recorded an album with Benzino (aka The Five Mic giver), Dave Mays has dated one of the artist's managers, and Lil' Kim is openly critical of 50 Cent. Benzino also likes rappers to stick to the unwritten "code of the streets". The Source's rating system is courpted. RollingStone, Blender and many others were very critical of the album and justified it as "fair"! The old saying: "If you scratch my back, I scratch yours!" Then yes Lil' Kim is indeed one of the few undeserving rappers who gets favorable coverage in The Source. Ask the rappers, Petey Pablo, Scarface, Ghostface, Ja Rule, and others who have recorded a song with Benzino. Little Brother would eliaborate on The Minstrel Show.

LILVOKA 26 November 2005 04:12 (UTC)

LILVOKA, why?

Can you please explain to me why you deleted the corrections and additions I made to this article? I don't think anything was inaccurate, and I corrected several spelling errors, grammatical errors and some parts that were (quite frankly) very poorly written. I spent a lot of time on this revision, please explain yourself.

Response to article edit

Thank you for addressing your concerns about the editing of the article Bill Shannon. The article is good, in fact, it's great! The only thing that I am critical about the article is, it's too broad (too many names, dates, events, etc.)! I think the article should be narrow, straight to the point, clear! I made previous edits before due to the similarity of the Benzino article. I mean the five mó being a copyright violation. If there's no proof there's a potential copyright violation, I will not delete it! I apologize for any concerns that were brought upon me an hope that we can work a compromise to writing a great article. In the meantime, thanks and keep writing good articles! (Note: When do discussions leave your name down so people know how to reach you)!-------------LILVOKA 2005 November 26 03:33 (UTC).

History vs Current

It should also be known that The Source owes Photogrpahers thousands of dollars for images, that were published. For all writers and photographers that were not paid for there services and was published in the magazine, is against copyright infridgement, which by the way is a FEDERAL offense. This magaizine will not last long, due to all the legal battles!!!

LILVOKA, thanks for clearing everything up for me. I think I understand your approach now. I do agree that there is a lot of information about the magazine, and while I do agree that we shouldn't concentrate on minutiae too much (too many names tend to cloud everything) and that the Benzino angle is an important and ongoing event, I do feel it's a good idea to reflect the history of the magazine. The magazine itself is now in a bit of a mess because of all the controversy, but in the early 1990s it was *THE* magazine about hip hop and rap music. And just because Benzino has wraught a bit of havoc, I think it's important to highlight it's contributions as well. For example, they did a very important article about the crack epidemic in 1994 which I thought was an indication of how serious the magazine became.

Again, thanks so much for your comments and thoughts. I'd be happy to concentrate on the history (since i used to read the magazine back in the early-to-mid 1990s and have many back issues) and I'll leave the Benzino aspect to you (or anyone else who might be reading). Does that sound fair?

Bill shannon 23:09, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

---Cool, It's good! Thanks for responding! LILVOKA 21:34, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

I added that controversial content under "see also" to The Source Article

Have you heard of the Stop Snitchin' T-shirts? If you have, then you know the increasing popularity on them! The link comes directly from the source. After victim advocates, political officials, Bill O'Reilly and myself (of course), realize that the content in them are highly offensive especially towards people who are on trial trying to testify against someone. I mean I am a firm believer in the First Admendment, Fourteenth Admendment and the Constitution but there's a line drawn when they use those T-shirts for threats against plantiffs and proscuators! If you get the chance, could you update the Made Men/Almighty RSO article. Al-Aywsam is a clothing company affiliated with Benzino and The Source. I can't do it tonight but I'll find some more content on the article as soon as possible. Thanks. LILVOKA 8 December 2005.

Cleanup

How does this article need to be cleaned up? Hyacinth 12:31, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

What happened to 100 Best Rap Albums? (rapguru)

Lawsuit

Added section on the lawsuit now that its over, let me know if you want me to add more to it, like individual claims of the workplace by Osorio etc. --NuclearZer0 18:33, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

why remove the album covers?

why were the album covers removed in the source 5 mics section? it made it neater and also looked professional and impressive, bring that shit back

Wow

This article is awful. I prefer XXL, but I wouldn't want their staff editing an article on The Source, which is what this looks like. If no one minds, I'll make a few big changes. Discuss here. Dg7891 (talk) 00:28, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Terrible Source

Deleted this link as it is not a credible source, clearly just some nobody with a computer who typed that up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.23.99.245 (talk) 08:14, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Bias

This article is clearly bias in favour of Eminem. I don't know enough about the actual events to edit it correctly, but could someone who does please try to make it unbiased. Kikolock (talk) 13:08, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Citation needed

Who the hell through "citation needed" all over the place? Dumaka (talk) 18:48, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Source. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061117201112/http://www.nypost.com:80/seven/10252006/news/regionalnews/editors_new_source_of_woe_regionalnews_leonard_greene.htm to http://www.nypost.com/seven/10252006/news/regionalnews/editors_new_source_of_woe_regionalnews_leonard_greene.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Who is Benzino

This article jumps right into a lawsuit involving Mays (founder) and Benzino. I don't know who Benzino is, is that a first name or a last name? Who is he/she related to The Source?

The page mentions the four founders but then dives right into this mystery person Benzino...doesn't make any sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.85.192.154 (talk) 15:21, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

How were the winners of the Source awards chosen?

Who was allowed to vote? That question is what brought me to this area of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevintimba (talk • contribs) 03:55, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Founders? History? Eminem Beef?

It seems like this article had much of its content pared away over time to the point it now doesn't even mention its founders, it's history, or the highly publicized "beef" between Benzino and Eminem. Seems a bit odd. OmniusM (talk) 22:04, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

What about L. Londell McMillan? Except that The Source it once sold on newsstands and the pair of NYTimes/LATimes citations, the challenge for WP:RS is quite far from being met. I found a small amount of material from other mainstream/professional publishing sources, such as the advertising industry. With so much material trimmed away, as noted above, the hatnote re WP:RS defies much of what Wikipedia:Reliable_sources actually says. Based on survival of the fittest, I'm removing the unreliable sources as being a matter of recentism. Nuts240 (talk) 12:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Edutainment

Back in 2010, an IP editor removed Edutainment from the 5 mics list. The album was given a 5/5 rating in the same issue as ATCQ's, Ice Cube's, and Eric B & Rakim's albums. However, as I was about to re-add it to the list, I noticed one small issue: these 4 albums weren't reviewed in their usual Record Report review section (which, apparently, didn't have ratings at the time), it was "Summer LP Preview" (page number is 43 vs Record Report's p. 60). In January 1998 issue, The Source named the other 3 albums "honorees of 5-mic rating", but left out Edutainment. While writing this, I managed to find a later review of Let the Rhythm Hit 'Em (August 1990, probably). People's Instinctive Travels and the Paths of Rhythm, on the other hand, was reviewed in May 1990 and didn't have a rating. So, to summarize:

• People's Instinctive Travels and the Paths of Rhythm — most certainly didn't receive 5 mics (broken records) in the original review, received 5/5 rating in the summer 1990 issue, was listed as 5 mics by The Source in 1998, listed in "Albums that originally received five mics" section of the article
• AmeriKKKa's Most Wanted — no indication of it receiving 5 mics, received 5/5 rating, was listed as 5 mics in 1998, listed as "originally received five mics" in the article
• Let the Rhythm Hit 'Em — received 5 mics on release, all fine
• Edutainment — didn't receive 5 mics on release, received 5/5 rating, wasn't listed as 5 mics in 1998, not listed as "originally received five mics" in the article

Either Edutainment needs to be re-added to "Albums that originally received five mics" or the first two need to be moved to "Albums that were not rated upon their releases, but were later rated five mics". Personally, I'm leaning towards the latter, but the other option is okay too. AstonishingTunesAdmirer 連絡 20:47, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Update: it turns out that David Mays, the founder of the magazine, when asked about the first five mics albums, said: "That Summer of 1990, the Ice Cube issue that I was talking about, was the first issue where we rated albums ... So, you know, I think in that Summer 1990 issue there may have been a couple albums that got five rating. AmeriKKKa's Most Wanted from Ice Cube, I think, was one of those. And there was... I think it was a BDP album or KRS-One album that also got five rating in that issue". So, since he confirmed that these ratings were genuine and even specifically named BDP's Edutainment as a five mic album, I went ahead and re-added Edutainment to the list. AstonishingTunesAdmirer 連絡 21:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)