Talk:The Tower of Druaga

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 47.132.192.6 in topic Tales of Destiny Bonus Dungeon

Untitled

edit

Perhaps we should use this page to hash out an agreement regarding the controversial MAME/Namco Museum issue.

Druaga Online?

edit

There is supposedly an MMO version of Tower of Druaga in development; If any information about this can be culled from the internet and added to the article, it would be greatly appreciated. Kouban 03:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

File:Todruaga.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Todruaga.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 5 June 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Todruaga.png)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:26, 5 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Influence on Miyamoto's "Zelda"?

edit

Should it be mentioned the vocal influence Miyamoto Shigeru has given this game for the secret-shared social network of obscurity vis-a-vis "playground" and "secret"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.210.0.171 (talk) 02:36, 14 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Tales of Destiny Bonus Dungeon

edit

Namco's Tales of Destiny has a bonus dungeon called the Tower of Druaga which replicates the gameplay of the Tower of Druaga. I feel this should be mentioned in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.132.192.6 (talk) 04:09, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Tower of Druaga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Tower of Druaga/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Abryn (talk · contribs) 15:12, 25 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


Starting review. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 15:12, 25 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
  • The Gameplay section says that each floor will have different enemies, does this mean that all 60 floors have an enemy that is unique to them?
  • From what I understand, Nintendo Life is only reliable for certain writers, and the reviewer Marcel van Duyn is a user of its website and not a member of its editorial staff.
  • The Dragon Quest source doesn't seem to identify that Nakamura's appreciation for Endou was because of Druaga. Do you have any supplementary information to demonstrate its relevance to this article?

Passing the article. Nice job! - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 21:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Oh, except one of the images lacks a fair use rationale, which is an easy fix. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 21:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Source

edit


Influence on FSN

edit

It was hinted in the Side Material book that Tower of Druaga was the influence of Gilgamesh's design in FSN. "Also, during the design stage, I selfishly insisted that 'Gil absolutely has to wear full golden plate armor'. Why, you ask? Well, it might be because I was repeatedly challenging a certain 60 story tower at the time..." Stated by Nasu on page 59. It belongs on the main Tower of Druaga page, end of story --Tailikku (talk) 17:21, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

This proves nothing. Nobody outside of fans of this obscure anime series are gonna care about some trival mention like this. It doesn't add anything to the article, the source is vague and I can't verify it, and it doesn't belong here. Stop edit warring. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 17:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply