Talk:The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

main pic

edit

is there a reason the main picture in the infobox changes on almost a daily occurrence? Lady Lotus (talk) 15:04, 29 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Split

edit

I think the music section should split into a soundtrack article.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 08:18, 13 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Upon reading your suggestion, I have split the music section into a separate page specifically for the soundtrack albums. It can be found at The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2 (soundtrack). --TFunk (talk) 23:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Critical reception

edit

Even though the film has a 48% rotten rating, there is not one negative review listed. MsBlackworld (talk) 07:02, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Why is there no mention in the Critical Reception section of this article that this film won almost every Golden Raspberry Award of 2012. Almost everything in this section of the article points to a positive reception, which this movie was a far cry from receiving. 2602:306:307B:2800:AC94:B4AF:A907:AD49 (talk) 20:31, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply