Talk:The Wrath of the Gods (1914 film)/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Will leave some initial comments some point tomorrow. ☠ Jaguar ☠ 19:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
I'm changing the format of my reviews now (so it's less awkward):
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Initial comments
edit- The lead is well-written and can see no problems here, so this meets the GA criteria
- "Toya decides to convert and marry Tom at the local Japanese-American mission" - marry at the local Japanese-American mission? I don't quite understand?
- The American mission in Japan.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:25, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- "Ince had constructed a very large village in his studio Inceville" - where was his studio located?
- "Four months prior to the release, New York Motion Picture Corporation put an ad"- advertisement?
- "The film was released in a new theater called The Strand, on 7 June 1914" - was it premièred here? Where was The Strand located?
- The film's DVD was released in the United States on 18 March 2008." - is there a reference for this?
- All the references are fine and the citations are in the correct places so this meets the GA criteria.
@Dr. Blofeld: This is a generally well-written article, there are very few prose problems here so the review is somewhat short! The only minor problems I found were a few confusing sentences that needs clarifying. I'll put this one on hold for the standard seven days. ☠ Jaguar ☠ 18:15, 30 August 2014 (UTC) @Jaguar: OK now?♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:36, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Close - promoted
editThanks for addressing those concerns so quickly! The article is well-written and referenced so in short it meets the GA criteria. I couldn't find any other problems with it despite the review feeling short. Just out of curiosity, is this film in the public domain now? I thought I have seen this one before but I'd like to watch it! Anyway well done on the extra work. Regards ☠ Jaguar ☠ 18:43, 30 August 2014 (UTC)