Talk:The Writers' Prize

Latest comment: 8 months ago by GreenC in topic Single table?

Requested move 14 December 2016

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. It would seem to be a bad idea to include the name of the sponsor in the name of the article, unless it were overwhelmingly referred to that way in sources. In this case, there is no consensus for a move. (non-admin closure) Bradv 05:54, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply


Folio PrizeRathbones Folio Prize – the name change reflects the new name of the prize after it was recently announced that the prize has a new sponsor, Rathbones. This new name is reflected in news sources covering the prize, including this Bookseller article, http://www.thebookseller.com/news/investment-company-rathbones-sponsor-folio-prize-446516, and the prize's official website, http://www.thefolioprize.com/the-prize/ Scope78 (talk) 11:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit

Discussion

edit

I have now RMd Booker Prize, see Talk:Man Booker Prize#Requested move 22 December 2016. Andrewa (talk) 18:37, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

In the cases of Emirates Stadium and King Power Stadium, raised by User:BDD above, if we leave out the sponsor we get a very ambiguous term, so the sponsor name is used as natural disambiguation. That's a very good point, not an unusual situation, and one that should be mentioned at wp:official names. Thank you! But in both these cases there are other available disambiguators. That doesn't make them less relevant, but I wonder whether there are other examples where no other common and natural disambiguator is available? Andrewa (talk) 19:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Booker Prize

edit

The RM closed as move, removing the sponsor name there too. The close is currently at move review but looks likely to be endorsed. Andrewa (talk) 21:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Writers' Prize

edit

I don't understand this naming. The prize continues to be largely a function of the Folio Academy. So they lost a sponsor, they resort back to "Folio Prize". Instead they choose a generic obviously placeholder name unrelated to Folio until they get a new sponsor, yet, continue to be managed by Folio. And whatever happened to The Literature Prize, another generic placeholder name. Very strange. -- GreenC 23:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Single table?

edit

The author and title columns are sortable, but as the winners are split into three tables, this doesn't let anyone sort the whole list of winners. It's agreed that this is the same prize under different names, well summarised in the lead and explained in detail thereafter.

I suggest we should combine the three tables into one. Any thoughts? PamD 06:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes, please. Literary awards are often changing names based on sponsorship. Keeping tables intact for sorting purposes is preferable. To indicate the name of the prize, and to keep sorting working properly, probably need to add a new column that contains the name of the prize. -- GreenC 18:29, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply