Talk:Thomas Mills Wood
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 5 July 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Lack of in-line citation
editGoodness, the article is all of three sentences long. The first two sentences are backed up by the single reference. The last sentence is covered by the IMDB site. The IMDB site also covers the two movies cited in the second sentence and the birth/death dates. Would it help a reader any more if those were placed in-line? --Bejnar (talk) 01:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
"In 2005, Wood founded an interdependent entertainment company dedicated to empowerment, inventiveness and respect of world cultures through entertainment. The company creates, develops, packages and promotes film, TV, music and stage projects independently and in partnership with others."
There is no mention of, or link to the name of his company. Is this a state secret? 2604:2000:1580:425C:1920:48F:A553:49A1 (talk) 19:12, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Repeated/Multiple instances of Revert
editWhoever is editing this page to "revert" on March 11, 2023, repeatedly, please identify yourself, and qualify your authority to do make such reversions which have the effect of deleting the revisions posted by THE ACTUAL HUMAN SUBJECT of this article? How do you justify taking action negating the additions of information from the actual source and subject of the article itself? GovernorTom (talk) 21:59, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- See the guideline about conflicts of interest as you claim to be the subject of the article. Also see the policies about verifiability as your content was unreferenced, and neutral point of view and spam as your content was written in a promotional manner. Also see the policy about edit warring because you repeatedly replaced the content in the face of opposition from two other editors including myself. Wikipedia editors do not have to "identify themselves", and demanding that they do is harassment; everyone "has authority" to edit Wikipedia so long as they follow the rules and guidelines. Dorsetonian (talk) 10:55, 12 March 2023 (UTC)