Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, GovernorTom. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Thomas Mills Wood, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Randompointofview (talk) 21:21, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2023

edit

  Hi GovernorTom! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Thomas Mills Wood several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Thomas Mills Wood, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Dorsetonian (talk) 21:28, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply