Talk:Thomas W. Sneddon Jr.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thomas W. Sneddon Jr. article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Thomas W. Sneddon Jr. be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editThomas Sneddon is a cold man. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.211.251.118 (talk) 12:25, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- I'm glad he finally died. I hope he didn't rest in peace but rest in pieces. 68.205.121.117 (talk) 03:54, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Minor update following Jackson verdict.
- this page seems somewhat biased against Thomas Sneddon. Not that I disagree with anything , but there has to be at least something positive to say on his behalf. Quazywabbit 03:08, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Specifically, referring to his "grudge" as if it were an established fact, not having any citations, and not dealing substantively with the manner of prosecution contribute to its non-neutrality. I have no opinion on the case, only on the manner of presentation here. GMcGath 15:53, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- this page also unfairly criticizes Michael Jackson for the song D.S. which no one even knows for certain was based on sneddon. Why is that not important? Why is sneddon's material important? I think THAT IS HYPOCRACY. --Paaerduag 08:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Pending changes
editThis article is one of a number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
 | Many of the articles were selected semi-automatically from a list of indefinitely semi-protected articles. Please confirm that the protection level appears to be still warranted, and consider unprotecting instead, before applying pending changes protection to the article. |
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes" would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:23, 17 June 2010 (UTC).
Vietnam War service
editAlthough Sneedon served in the army during the Vietnam War era, no reliable sources found as of yet state that he served in Vietnam. Accordingly, Category:American military personnel of the Vietnam War was removed from the article for now until a reliable ref is found. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 11:42, 11 August 2019 (UTC)